Literature DB >> 26142256

Patient-specific dose calculations for pediatric CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis.

Susan D Kost1,2, Nicholas D Fraser3, Diana E Carver4,3, David R Pickens3, Ronald R Price3, Marta Hernanz-Schulman3, Michael G Stabin4,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Organ dose is essential for accurate estimates of patient dose from CT.
OBJECTIVE: To determine organ doses from a broad range of pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic chest-abdomen-pelvis CT and investigate how these relate to patient size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a previously validated Monte Carlo simulation model of a Philips Brilliance 64 multi-detector CT scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) to calculate organ doses for 40 pediatric patients (M:F = 21:19; range 0.6-17 years). Organ volumes and positions were determined from the images using standard segmentation techniques. Non-linear regression was performed to determine the relationship between volume CT dose index (CTDIvol)-normalized organ doses and abdominopelvic diameter. We then compared results with values obtained from independent studies.
RESULTS: We found that CTDIvol-normalized organ dose correlated strongly with exponentially decreasing abdominopelvic diameter (R(2) > 0.8 for most organs). A similar relationship was determined for effective dose when normalized by dose-length product (R(2) = 0.95). Our results agreed with previous studies within 12% using similar scan parameters (e.g., bowtie filter size, beam collimation); however results varied up to 25% when compared to studies using different bowtie filters.
CONCLUSION: Our study determined that organ doses can be estimated from measurements of patient size, namely body diameter, and CTDIvol prior to CT examination. This information provides an improved method for patient dose estimation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Computed tomography; Effective dose; Monte Carlo; Organ dose; Patient size

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26142256      PMCID: PMC4623993          DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3400-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  30 in total

1.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Joseph Piven; Heather Cody Hazlett; Rachel Gimpel Smith; Sean Ho; James C Gee; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  U Schneider; E Pedroni; A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination.

Authors:  Robert J Staton; Choonik Lee; Choonsik Lee; Matt D Williams; David E Hintenlang; Manuel M Arreola; Jonathon L Williams; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Dose indices: everybody wants a number.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

5.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003.

Authors:  P C Shrimpton; M C Hillier; M A Lewis; M Dunn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Development and validation of a GEANT4 radiation transport code for CT dosimetry.

Authors:  D E Carver; S D Kost; M J Fernald; K G Lewis; N D Fraser; D R Pickens; R R Price; M G Stabin
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. A report of age- and gender-related differences in the anatomical and physiological characteristics of reference individuals. ICRP Publication 89.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2002

Review 8.  Dose reduction in paediatric MDCT: general principles.

Authors:  A Paterson; D P Frush
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.

Authors:  J J DeMarco; C H Cagnon; D D Cody; D M Stevens; C H McCollough; M Zankl; E Angel; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  5 in total

1.  Detection of Relapse by Tumor Markers Versus Imaging in Children and Adolescents With Nongerminomatous Malignant Germ Cell Tumors: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Adriana Fonseca; Caihong Xia; Armando J Lorenzo; Mark Krailo; Thomas A Olson; Farzana Pashankar; Marcio H Malogolowkin; James F Amatruda; Deborah F Billmire; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; A Lindsay Frazier; Furqan Shaikh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Realistic phantoms to characterize dosimetry in pediatric CT.

Authors:  Diana E Carver; Susan D Kost; Nicholas D Fraser; W Paul Segars; David R Pickens; Ronald R Price; Michael G Stabin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-03-10

3.  Rapid switching kVp dual energy CT: Value of reconstructed dual energy CT images and organ dose assessment in multiphasic liver CT exams.

Authors:  Usman Mahmood; Natally Horvat; Joao Vicente Horvat; Davinia Ryan; Yiming Gao; Gabriella Carollo; Rommel DeOcampo; Richard K Do; Seth Katz; Scott Gerst; C Ross Schmidtlein; Lawrence Dauer; Yusuf Erdi; Lorenzo Mannelli
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  A comparison of pediatric and adult CT organ dose estimation methods.

Authors:  Yiming Gao; Brian Quinn; Usman Mahmood; Daniel Long; Yusuf Erdi; Jean St Germain; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; X George Xu; Wesley E Bolch; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Individual Calculation of Effective Dose and Risk of Malignancy Based on Monte Carlo Simulations after Whole Body Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Markus Kopp; Tobias Loewe; Wolfgang Wuest; Michael Brand; Matthias Wetzl; Wolfram Nitsch; Daniela Schmidt; Michael Beck; Bernhard Schmidt; Michael Uder; Matthias May
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.