Literature DB >> 15933130

CT dosimetry: getting the best from the adult Cristy phantom.

I A Castellano1, D R Dance, P M Evans.   

Abstract

The use of geometrical phantoms for computed tomography (CT) dosimetry can incur errors in the calculation of effective dose due to the anatomically incorrect organ shapes and distributions, and unrepresentative body dimensions. A Monte Carlo program that makes use of an anatomically correct voxel phantom has been developed to calculate effective doses in CT and to compare with conventional dosimetric techniques. The code was validated against the latter by matching the phantom dimensions and simulating whole-body irradiation; agreement to within 6% was found. Effective doses were calculated for brain, lung, abdomen and pelvis CT scans for voxel phantom sizes corresponding to those of standard-sized adult, a teenager and 10% greater than those of standard-sized adult. Errors incurred by using the conventional techniques are minimised if the scan range is set by matching the fractions of radiosensitive organs that are irradiated directly. Under these circumstances, the conventional techniques will underestimate the dose to a 15 y old by up to 22% while the dose to a large subject is overestimated by up to 11%.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15933130     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  10 in total

1.  Population exposure to ionising radiation from CT examinations in Aosta Valley between 2001 and 2008.

Authors:  P Catuzzo; S Aimonetto; F Zenone; G Fanelli; P Marchisio; T Meloni; M Pasquino; S Tofani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review.

Authors:  Paul C Shrimpton; Jan T M Jansen; John D Harrison
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Radiation dose and cancer risk in retrospectively and prospectively ECG-gated coronary angiography using 64-slice multidetector CT.

Authors:  B Huang; J Li; M W-M Law; J Zhang; Y Shen; P L Khong
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  A set of 4D pediatric XCAT reference phantoms for multimodality research.

Authors:  Hannah Norris; Yakun Zhang; Jason Bond; Gregory M Sturgeon; Anum Minhas; Daniel J Tward; J T Ratnanather; M I Miller; D Frush; E Samei; W P Segars
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part I. development and validation of a Monte Carlo program.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Greta Toncheva; Terry T Yoshizumi; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Patient-specific dose estimation for pediatric chest CT.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Population of anatomically variable 4D XCAT adult phantoms for imaging research and optimization.

Authors:  W P Segars; Jason Bond; Jack Frush; Sylvia Hon; Chris Eckersley; Cameron H Williams; Jianqiao Feng; Daniel J Tward; J T Ratnanather; M I Miller; D Frush; E Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Organ doses, effective doses, and risk indices in adult CT: comparison of four types of reference phantoms across different examination protocols.

Authors:  Yakun Zhang; Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.506

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.