Literature DB >> 26472880

MCAT to XCAT: The Evolution of 4-D Computerized Phantoms for Imaging Research: Computer models that take account of body movements promise to provide evaluation and improvement of medical imaging devices and technology.

W Paul Segars1, Benjamin M W Tsui2.   

Abstract

Recent work in the development of computerized phantoms has focused on the creation of ideal "hybrid" models that seek to combine the realism of a patient-based voxelized phantom with the flexibility of a mathematical or stylized phantom. We have been leading the development of such computerized phantoms for use in medical imaging research. This paper will summarize our developments dating from the original four-dimensional (4-D) Mathematical Cardiac-Torso (MCAT) phantom, a stylized model based on geometric primitives, to the current 4-D extended Cardiac-Torso (XCAT) and Mouse Whole-Body (MOBY) phantoms, hybrid models of the human and laboratory mouse based on state-of-the-art computer graphics techniques. This paper illustrates the evolution of computerized phantoms toward more accurate models of anatomy and physiology. This evolution was catalyzed through the introduction of nonuniform rational b-spline (NURBS) and subdivision (SD) surfaces, tools widely used in computer graphics, as modeling primitives to define a more ideal hybrid phantom. With NURBS and SD surfaces as a basis, we progressed from a simple geometrically based model of the male torso (MCAT) containing only a handful of structures to detailed, whole-body models of the male and female (XCAT) anatomies (at different ages from newborn to adult), each containing more than 9000 structures. The techniques we applied for modeling the human body were similarly used in the creation of the 4-D MOBY phantom, a whole-body model for the mouse designed for small animal imaging research. From our work, we have found the NURBS and SD surface modeling techniques to be an efficient and flexible way to describe the anatomy and physiology for realistic phantoms. Based on imaging data, the surfaces can accurately model the complex organs and structures in the body, providing a level of realism comparable to that of a voxelized phantom. In addition, they are very flexible. Like stylized models, they can easily be manipulated to model anatomical variations and patient motion. With the vast improvement in realism, the phantoms developed in our lab can be combined with accurate models of the imaging process (SPECT, PET, CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound) to generate simulated imaging data close to that from actual human or animal subjects. As such, they can provide vital tools to generate predictive imaging data from many different subjects under various scanning parameters from which to quantitatively evaluate and improve imaging devices and techniques. From the MCAT to XCAT, we will demonstrate how NURBS and SD surface modeling have resulted in a major evolutionary advance in the development of computerized phantoms for imaging research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging; phantom; simulation

Year:  2009        PMID: 26472880      PMCID: PMC4603876          DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2022417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng        ISSN: 0018-9219            Impact factor:   10.961


  48 in total

1.  All about MAX: a male adult voxel phantom for Monte Carlo calculations in radiation protection dosimetry.

Authors:  R Kramer; J W Vieira; H J Khoury; F R A Lima; D Fuelle
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  MRI simulator with object-specific field map calculations.

Authors:  Duane A Yoder; Yansong Zhao; Cynthia B Paschal; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Unified description and validation of Monte Carlo simulators in PET.

Authors:  Irène Buvat; Isabella Castiglioni; Juliette Feuardent; Maria-Carla Gilardi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  PETSIM: Monte Carlo simulation of all sensitivity and resolution parameters of cylindrical positron imaging systems.

Authors:  C J Thompson; J Moreno-Cantu; Y Picard
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  MAX06 and FAX06: update of two adult human phantoms for radiation protection dosimetry.

Authors:  R Kramer; H J Khoury; J W Vieira; V J M Lima
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Efficient simulation of magnetic resonance imaging with Bloch-Torrey equations using intra-voxel magnetization gradients.

Authors:  Thies H Jochimsen; Andreas Schäfer; Roland Bammer; Michael E Moseley
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Validation of GATE Monte Carlo simulations of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanners.

Authors:  C Ross Schmidtlein; Assen S Kirov; Sadek A Nehmeh; Yusuf E Erdi; John L Humm; Howard I Amols; Luc M Bidaut; Alex Ganin; Charles W Stearns; David L McDaniel; Klaus A Hamacher
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The effect of breast compression on mass conspicuity in digital mammography.

Authors:  Robert S Saunders; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Patient-specific dose estimation for pediatric chest CT.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  The UF series of tomographic computational phantoms of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Choonik Lee; Jonathan L Williams; Choonsik Lee; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  38 in total

1.  Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI) using image-based respiratory surrogate: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jing Cai; Zheng Chang; Zhiheng Wang; William Paul Segars; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Factors affecting the normality of channel outputs of channelized model observers: an investigation using realistic myocardial perfusion SPECT images.

Authors:  Fatma E A Elshahaby; Michael Ghaly; Abhinav K Jha; Eric C Frey
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-01-28

4.  Canny edge-based deformable image registration.

Authors:  Vasant Kearney; Yihui Huang; Weihua Mao; Baohong Yuan; Liping Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Computational modeling of airway and pulmonary vascular structure and function: development of a "lung physiome".

Authors:  Merryn Tawhai; A Clark; G Donovan; K Burrowes
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011

6.  Generation of a suite of 3D computer-generated breast phantoms from a limited set of human subject data.

Authors:  Christina M L Hsu; Mark L Palmeri; W Paul Segars; Alexander I Veress; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Realistic analytical polyhedral MRI phantoms.

Authors:  Tri M Ngo; George S K Fung; Shuo Han; Min Chen; Jerry L Prince; Benjamin M W Tsui; Elliot R McVeigh; Daniel A Herzka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Design of a digital phantom population for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging research.

Authors:  Michael Ghaly; Yong Du; George S K Fung; Benjamin M W Tsui; Jonathan M Links; Eric Frey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Towards coronary plaque imaging using simultaneous PET-MR: a simulation study.

Authors:  Y Petibon; G El Fakhri; R Nezafat; N Johnson; T Brady; J Ouyang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Accuracy of respiratory motion measurement of 4D-MRI: A comparison between cine and sequential acquisition.

Authors:  Yilin Liu; Fang-Fang Yin; DongJoo Rhee; Jing Cai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.