Literature DB >> 18843499

The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Jong-Hyun Oh1, Chungkwon Yoo, Yong Yeon Kim, Hyo-Myung Kim, Jong-Suk Song.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in Asian subjects. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 40 eyes of 20 normal volunteers with no evidence of ocular disease.
METHODS: Forty eyes of 20 healthy volunteers were required to wear soft contact lenses for 2 hours to induce corneal swelling. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP were measured before and immediately after contact lens wear using specular microscope, GAT, and DCT. The IOP measurements by GAT and DCT were compared. The changes in the CCT and the IOP measurements after wearing contact lenses were assessed.
RESULTS: The mean CCT of the 40 eyes evaluated was 532.6 +/- 31.6 microm. The mean IOP was 11.78 +/- 2.04 mmHg for the GAT and 14.46 +/- 1.89 mmHg for the DCT, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). After wearing contact lenses, the mean CCT was 553.2 +/- 34.3 microm, which was 20.6 +/- 12.9 microm greater than before wearing them (P < 0.001). The mean IOP measurements of the GAT and DCT were decreased after wearing the contact lenses. The mean decrease of the GAT values was 0.43 +/- 1.95 mmHg, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.175). However, the mean decrease of the DCT readings, which was 0.75 +/- 1.74 mm Hg, was statistically significant (P = 0.010).
CONCLUSION: The IOP measurements with DCT were significantly higher than those with GAT in healthy Asian eyes. Although the mean IOP measurements of both the GAT and the DCT were decreased in the edematous cornea, IOP measurements of the DCT were more affected by corneal edema than were the GAT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18843499     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-0954-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  25 in total

Review 1.  Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  M J Doughty; M L Zaman
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R A Stein; K Hassanein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 4.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

5.  Comparison of MacKay-Marg, Goldmann, and Perkins tonometers in abnormal corneas.

Authors:  F McMillan; R K Forster
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-06

6.  Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states.

Authors:  Christoph Kniestedt; Michelle Nee; Robert L Stamper
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P.

Authors:  P Cho; S W Cheung
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.424

8.  Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Authors:  Brian A Francis; Amy Hsieh; Mei-Ying Lai; Vikas Chopra; Fernando Pena; Stanley Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography.

Authors:  G Simon; R H Small; Q Ren; J M Parel
Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr

10.  The effect of contact lens induced oedema on the accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in a mature population.

Authors:  K Hamilton; D Pye; S Hua; F Yu; J Chung; Q Hou
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  8 in total

1.  The influence of soft contact lenses on the intraocular pressure measurement.

Authors:  P G Firat; C Cankaya; S Doganay; M Cavdar; S Duman; E Ozsoy; B Koc
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  [Sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  F Rüfer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Assessment of postnatal corneal development in the C57BL/6 mouse using spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microwave-assisted histology.

Authors:  Samuel D Hanlon; Nimesh B Patel; Alan R Burns
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP.

Authors:  Chungkwon Yoo; Young Sub Eom; Yong Yeon Kim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness in primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Marcelo Lopes Silva Jordão; Vital Paulino Costa; Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues; Jayter Silva Paula
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Myopia Progression in Children Wearing Spectacles vs. Switching to Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Wendy L Marsh-Tootle; Li Ming Dong; Leslie Hyman; Jane Gwiazda; Katherine K Weise; Lynette Dias; Karen D Fernp
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and Tono-Pen XL in edematous corneas.

Authors:  George A Kontadakis; Alexandros Pennos; Iro Pentari; George D Kymionis; Ioannis G Pallikaris; Harilaos Ginis
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-10

8.  Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Anne Herr; Andreas Remky; Thalia Hirsch; Corinna Rennings; Niklas Plange
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.