Literature DB >> 21533609

[Sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry].

F Rüfer1.   

Abstract

Reliable measurements of the intraocular pressure (IOP) are necessary for glaucoma patients. The measuring procedure, anatomical changes of the eye or extraocular influences can lead to errors during applanation tonometry. The IOP is overestimated if measured through the wrong eyepiece of the slit lamp, if a force is interfering with the tonometer arm during the measurement, if the lid comes into contact with the tonometer tip, if blepharospasm occurs, if there is lid retraction or if a Valsalva maneuver is present. An underestimation of the IOP occurs if staining with fluorescein is absent or insufficient, if the illumination is not bright enough, if a corneal stromal edema is present, after LASIK, during accommodation, during repeated measures within a few minutes or during systemic blood pressure drop. Discrepancies of the IOP in both directions can appear if the calibration of the tonometer is irregular, if abnormal central corneal thickness or astigmatism is present. For correct measurements calibrations are advised once or twice a year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21533609     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-011-2370-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  31 in total

1.  Tonometer utilization, accuracy, and calibration under field conditions.

Authors:  I F Wessels; Y Oh
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-12

2.  [Homeostatic regulation of intraocular pressure. Experimental and clinical findings].

Authors:  W LEYDHECKER
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild       Date:  1961-12

3.  The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors.

Authors:  Sukhpal S Sandhu; Sandip Chattopadhyay; George A Amariotakis; Fillipos Skarmoutsos; Michael K Birch; Neeta Ray-Chaudhuri
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  'Moustache glaucoma'.

Authors:  R Ritch; A Reyes
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-11

Review 5.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Proptosis and increase of intraocular pressure in voluntary lid fissure widening.

Authors:  R A Moses; P E Carniglia; W J Grodzki; J Moses
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  [On spontaneous decrease of pressure in applanation tonometry].

Authors:  E Bechrakis
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 3.250

8.  Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography.

Authors:  G Simon; R H Small; Q Ren; J M Parel
Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr

9.  Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.

Authors:  M G dos Santos; S Makk; A Berghold; M Eckhardt; A Haas
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Authors:  Jong-Hyun Oh; Chungkwon Yoo; Yong Yeon Kim; Hyo-Myung Kim; Jong-Suk Song
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  8 in total

1.  Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.

Authors:  Jan Luebke; L Bryniok; M Neuburger; J F Jordan; D Boehringer; T Reinhard; T Wecker; A Anton
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparative measurement of intraocular pressure by Icare tonometry and Airpuff tonometry in healthy subjects and patients wearing therapeutic soft contact lenses.

Authors:  Alexandra Anton; Matthias Neuburger; Daniel Böhringer; Jens F Jordan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [Differences in the measurement results of Goldmann applanation tonometry with and without fluorescein].

Authors:  N Arend; C Hirneiss; M Kernt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Ease of handling of first and second generation rebound tonometers].

Authors:  N Mihailovic; J Termühlen; M Alnawaiseh; N Eter; T S Dietlein; A Rosentreter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.

Authors:  Martin Zimmermann; Susanne Pitz; Irene Schmidtmann; Norbert Pfeiffer; Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A comparison of NCT, Goldman application tonometry values with and without fluorescein.

Authors:  Hakika Erdogan; Ziya Akingol; Ozlem Cam; Sadik Sencan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-29

7.  [Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard].

Authors:  J Steinberg; J Mehlan; A Frings; V Druchkiv; G Richard; T Katz; S J Linke
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Effect of Hemifacial Spasm on Intraocular Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Erdogan Cicik; Rengin Yildirim; Ceyhun Arici; Funda Dikkaya; Osman Sevki Arslan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.