Literature DB >> 18718760

Direction of visual apparent motion driven solely by timing of a static sound.

Elliot Freeman1, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

In temporal ventriloquism, auditory events can illusorily attract perceived timing of a visual onset [1-3]. We investigated whether timing of a static sound can also influence spatio-temporal processing of visual apparent motion, induced here by visual bars alternating between opposite hemifields. Perceived direction typically depends on the relative interval in timing between visual left-right and right-left flashes (e.g., rightwards motion dominating when left-to-right interflash intervals are shortest [4]). In our new multisensory condition, interflash intervals were equal, but auditory beeps could slightly lag the right flash, yet slightly lead the left flash, or vice versa. This auditory timing strongly influenced perceived visual motion direction, despite providing no spatial auditory motion signal whatsoever. Moreover, prolonged adaptation to such auditorily driven apparent motion produced a robust visual motion aftereffect in the opposite direction, when measured in subsequent silence. Control experiments argued against accounts in terms of possible auditory grouping, or possible attention capture. We suggest that the motion arises because the sounds change perceived visual timing, as we separately confirmed. Our results provide a new demonstration of multisensory influences on sensory-specific perception [5], with timing of a static sound influencing spatio-temporal processing of visual motion direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18718760      PMCID: PMC2882789          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  20 in total

Review 1.  Multisensory perception: beyond modularity and convergence.

Authors:  J Driver; C Spence
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-10-19       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Hearing visual motion in depth.

Authors:  Norimichi Kitagawa; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals.

Authors:  G F Meyer; S M Wuerger
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-08-08       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 4.  Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Alan Kingstone; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  The ventriloquist in motion: illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Jessica Lyons; Michael Gazzaniga; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

6.  Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-06

7.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  ILAB: a program for postexperimental eye movement analysis.

Authors:  Darren R Gitelman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2002-11

9.  Temporal ventriloquism: sound modulates the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Jean Vroomen; Beatrice de Gelder; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The effect of brief auditory stimuli on visual apparent motion.

Authors:  Stephan Getzmann
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  40 in total

1.  Auditory temporal modulation of the visual Ternus effect: the influence of time interval.

Authors:  Zhuanghua Shi; Lihan Chen; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Auditory modulation of visual apparent motion with short spatial and temporal intervals.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Auditory modulation of spiking activity and local field potentials in area MT does not appear to underlie an audiovisual temporal illusion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Thomas D Albright; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Sound-contingent visual motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Maori Kobayashi; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Fast transfer of crossmodal time interval training.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Looming sounds enhance orientation sensitivity for visual stimuli on the same side as such sounds.

Authors:  Fabrizio Leo; Vincenzo Romei; Elliot Freeman; Elisabetta Ladavas; Jon Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Alternation of sound location induces visual motion perception of a static object.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Yuko Manaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita; Ryota Miyauchi; Jiro Gyoba; Yôiti Suzuki; Yukio Iwaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The audiovisual tau effect in infancy.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe; Nobu Shirai; Yuji Wada; Kayo Miura; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Visual influences on ferret auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.