Literature DB >> 21643714

Looming sounds enhance orientation sensitivity for visual stimuli on the same side as such sounds.

Fabrizio Leo1, Vincenzo Romei, Elliot Freeman, Elisabetta Ladavas, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

Several recent multisensory studies show that sounds can influence visual processing. Some visual judgments can be enhanced for visual stimuli near a sound occurring around the same time. A recent TMS study (Romei et al. 2009) indicates looming sounds might influence visual cortex particularly strongly. But unlike most previous behavioral studies of possible audio-visual exogenous effects, TMS phosphene thresholds rather than judgments of external visual stimuli were measured. Moreover, the visual hemifield assessed relative to the hemifield of the sound was not varied. Here, we compared the impact of looming sounds to receding or "static" sounds, using auditory stimuli adapted from Romei et al. (2009), but now assessing any influence on visual orientation discrimination for Gabor patches (well-known to involve early visual cortex) when appearing in the same hemifield as the sound or on the opposite side. The looming sounds that were effective in Romei et al. (2009) enhanced visual orientation sensitivity (d') here on the side of the sound, but not for the opposite hemifield. This crossmodal, spatially specific effect was stronger for looming than receding or static sounds. Similarly to Romei et al. (2009), the differential effect for looming sounds was eliminated when using white noise rather than structured sounds. Our new results show that looming structured sounds can specifically benefit visual orientation sensitivity in the hemifield of the sound, even when the sound provides no information about visual orientation itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21643714      PMCID: PMC3155046          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2742-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  48 in total

1.  d'plus: A program to calculate accuracy and bias measures from detection and discrimination data.

Authors:  N A Macmillan; C D Creelman
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

2.  Looming biases in monkey auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joost X Maier; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Auditory enhancement of visual phosphene perception: the effect of temporal and spatial factors and of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Irene Senna; Angelo Maravita; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Orientation discrimination is impaired in the absence of the striate cortical contribution to human vision.

Authors:  A B Morland; J A Ogilvie; K H Ruddock; J R Wright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Preperceptual and stimulus-selective enhancement of low-level human visual cortex excitability by sounds.

Authors:  Vincenzo Romei; Micah M Murray; Céline Cappe; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Neural processing of auditory looming in the human brain.

Authors:  Erich Seifritz; John G Neuhoff; Deniz Bilecen; Klaus Scheffler; Henrietta Mustovic; Hartmut Schächinger; Raffaele Elefante; Francesco Di Salle
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-12-23       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Direction of visual apparent motion driven solely by timing of a static sound.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Jon Driver
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Audiovisual temporal correspondence modulates human multisensory superior temporal sulcus plus primary sensory cortices.

Authors:  Toemme Noesselt; Jochem W Rieger; Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld; Martin Kanowski; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jon Driver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  22 in total

1.  Looming signals reveal synergistic principles of multisensory integration.

Authors:  Céline Cappe; Antonia Thelen; Vincenzo Romei; Gregor Thut; Micah M Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Multisensory integration: from fundamental principles to translational research.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Tingting Bi; Jing Wu; Fanzhu Meng; Kun Wang; Jiawei Hu; Xiao Han; Jiping Zhang; Xiaoming Zhou; Les Keniston; Liping Yu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Sounds activate visual cortex and improve visual discrimination.

Authors:  Wenfeng Feng; Viola S Störmer; Antigona Martinez; John J McDonald; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cross-modal effects of value on perceptual acuity and stimulus encoding.

Authors:  Arezoo Pooresmaeili; Thomas H B FitzGerald; Dominik R Bach; Ulf Toelch; Florian Ostendorf; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Audiovisual Modulation in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex Depends on Cross-Modal Stimulus Configuration and Congruency.

Authors:  Guido T Meijer; Jorrit S Montijn; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Carien S Lansink
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Asymmetries in behavioral and neural responses to spectral cues demonstrate the generality of auditory looming bias.

Authors:  Robert Baumgartner; Darrin K Reed; Brigitta Tóth; Virginia Best; Piotr Majdak; H Steven Colburn; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Audio-visual detection benefits in the rat.

Authors:  Stephanie Gleiss; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dynamic sounds capture the boundaries of peripersonal space representation in humans.

Authors:  Elisa Canzoneri; Elisa Magosso; Andrea Serino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Audio-visual interactions for motion perception in depth modulate activity in visual area V3A.

Authors:  Akitoshi Ogawa; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.