Literature DB >> 14761661

The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

David Alais1, David Burr.   

Abstract

Ventriloquism is the ancient art of making one's voice appear to come from elsewhere, an art exploited by the Greek and Roman oracles, and possibly earlier. We regularly experience the effect when watching television and movies, where the voices seem to emanate from the actors' lips rather than from the actual sound source. Originally, ventriloquism was explained by performers projecting sound to their puppets by special techniques, but more recently it is assumed that ventriloquism results from vision "capturing" sound. In this study we investigate spatial localization of audio-visual stimuli. When visual localization is good, vision does indeed dominate and capture sound. However, for severely blurred visual stimuli (that are poorly localized), the reverse holds: sound captures vision. For less blurred stimuli, neither sense dominates and perception follows the mean position. Precision of bimodal localization is usually better than either the visual or the auditory unimodal presentation. All the results are well explained not by one sense capturing the other, but by a simple model of optimal combination of visual and auditory information.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14761661     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  531 in total

1.  Combination of texture and color cues in visual segmentation.

Authors:  Toni P Saarela; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Human spatial orientation in non-stationary environments: relation between self-turning perception and detection of surround motion.

Authors:  Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Alterations to multisensory and unisensory integration by stimulus competition.

Authors:  Scott R Pluta; Benjamin A Rowland; Terrence R Stanford; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Synchronization with competing visual and auditory rhythms: bouncing ball meets metronome.

Authors:  Michael J Hove; John R Iversen; Allen Zhang; Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-05-26

7.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Edward Awh; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06

9.  A recursive Bayesian updating model of haptic stiffness perception.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.