Literature DB >> 23035130

Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Hulusi Kafaligonul1, Gene R Stoner.   

Abstract

Visual motion processing is essential to survival in a dynamic world and is probably the best-studied facet of visual perception. It has been recently discovered that the timing of brief static sounds can bias visual motion perception, an effect attributed to "temporal ventriloquism" whereby the timing of the sounds "captures" the timing of the visual events. To determine whether this cross-modal interaction is dependent on the involvement of higher-order attentive tracking mechanisms, we used near-threshold motion stimuli that isolated low-level pre-attentive visual motion processing. We found that the timing of brief sounds altered sensitivity to these visual motion stimuli in a manner that paralleled changes in the timing of the visual stimuli. Our findings indicate that auditory timing impacts visual motion processing very early in the processing hierarchy and without the involvement of higher-order attentional and/or position tracking mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23035130      PMCID: PMC3499981          DOI: 10.1167/12.11.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  42 in total

1.  Attention-based motion perception.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-04

3.  Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Sophie M Wuerger; Florian Röhrbein; Christoph Zetzsche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual modulation of neurons in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Christopher I Petkov; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Phi movement as a subtraction process.

Authors:  S M Anstis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion.

Authors:  O J Braddick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The effect of sound on visual apparent movement.

Authors:  H E Staal; D C Donderi
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1983

8.  Cross-modal phase reset predicts auditory task performance in humans.

Authors:  Jeremy D Thorne; Maarten De Vos; Filipa Campos Viola; Stefan Debener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Direction of visual apparent motion driven solely by timing of a static sound.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Jon Driver
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Ubiquitous crossmodal Stochastic Resonance in humans: auditory noise facilitates tactile, visual and proprioceptive sensations.

Authors:  Eduardo Lugo; Rafael Doti; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Auditory modulation of spiking activity and local field potentials in area MT does not appear to underlie an audiovisual temporal illusion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Thomas D Albright; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Attentional modulations of audiovisual interactions in apparent motion: Temporal ventriloquism effects on perceived visual speed.

Authors:  Aysun Duyar; Andrea Pavan; Hulusi Kafaligonul
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  Audiovisual associations alter the perception of low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Can Oluk
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-31

4.  Grouping by feature of cross-modal flankers in temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Michaela Klimova; Shin'ya Nishida; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Auditory and Visual Motion Processing and Integration in the Primate Cerebral Cortex.

Authors:  Tristan A Chaplin; Marcello G P Rosa; Leo L Lui
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 6.  Optimality and Limitations of Audio-Visual Integration for Cognitive Systems.

Authors:  William Paul Boyce; Anthony Lindsay; Arkady Zgonnikov; Iñaki Rañó; KongFatt Wong-Lin
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-07-17

7.  Rapid Motion Adaptation Reveals the Temporal Dynamics of Spatiotemporal Correlation between ON and OFF Pathways.

Authors:  Can Oluk; Andrea Pavan; Hulusi Kafaligonul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.