Literature DB >> 11496148

Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals.

G F Meyer1, S M Wuerger.   

Abstract

Real-world moving objects are usually defined by correlated information in multiple sensory modalities such as vision and hearing. The aim of our study was to assess whether simultaneous auditory supra-threshold motion introduces a bias or affects the sensitivity in a visual motion detection task. We demonstrate a bias in the perceived direction of visual motion that is consistent with the direction of the auditory motion (audio-visual motion capture). This bias effect is robust and occurs even if the auditory and visual motion signals come from different locations or move at different speeds. We also show that visual motion detection thresholds are higher for consistent auditory motion than for inconsistent motion, provided the stimuli move at the same speed and are co-localised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11496148     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200108080-00053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  43 in total

1.  Unimodal and crossmodal effects of endogenous attention to visual and auditory motion.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Catching audiovisual mice: predicting the arrival time of auditory-visual motion signals.

Authors:  M Hofbauer; S M Wuerger; G F Meyer; F Roehrbein; K Schill; C Zetzsche
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Sophie M Wuerger; Florian Röhrbein; Christoph Zetzsche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Auditory motion affects visual motion perception in a speeded discrimination task.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The modulation of crossmodal integration by unimodal perceptual grouping: a visuotactile apparent motion study.

Authors:  Georgina Lyons; Daniel Sanabria; Argiro Vatakis; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Sensitive period for a multimodal response in human visual motion area MT/MST.

Authors:  Marina Bedny; Talia Konkle; Kevin Pelphrey; Rebecca Saxe; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.