Literature DB >> 14527547

Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion.

Salvador Soto-Faraco1, Alan Kingstone, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

The ability to process motion is crucial for coherent perception and action. While the majority of studies have focused on the unimodal factors that influence motion perception (see, for example, the other chapters in this Special Issue), some researchers have also investigated the extent to which information presented in one sensory modality can affect the perception of motion for stimuli presented in another modality. Although early studies often gave rise to mixed results, the development of increasingly sophisticated psychophysical paradigms are now enabling researchers to determine the spatiotemporal constraints on multisensory interactions in the perception of motion. Recent findings indicate that these interactions stand over-and-above the multisensory interactions documented previously for static stimuli, such as the oft-cited 'ventriloquism' effect. Neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies are also beginning to elucidate the network of neural structures responsible for the processing of motion information in the different sensory modalities, an important first step that will ultimately lead to the determination of the neural substrates underlying these multisensory contributions to motion perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14527547     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00185-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  36 in total

1.  Unimodal and crossmodal effects of endogenous attention to visual and auditory motion.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Catching audiovisual mice: predicting the arrival time of auditory-visual motion signals.

Authors:  M Hofbauer; S M Wuerger; G F Meyer; F Roehrbein; K Schill; C Zetzsche
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  When does visual perceptual grouping affect multisensory integration?

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Jason S Chan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Kinesthetic information disambiguates visual motion signals.

Authors:  Bo Hu; David C Knill
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Remapping motion across modalities: tactile rotations influence visual motion judgments.

Authors:  Martin V Butz; Roland Thomaschke; Matthias J Linhardt; Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Sophie M Wuerger; Florian Röhrbein; Christoph Zetzsche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Edward Awh; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.