Literature DB >> 21569617

Sound-contingent visual motion aftereffect.

Souta Hidaka1, Wataru Teramoto, Maori Kobayashi, Yoichi Sugita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After a prolonged exposure to a paired presentation of different types of signals (e.g., color and motion), one of the signals (color) becomes a driver for the other signal (motion). This phenomenon, which is known as contingent motion aftereffect, indicates that the brain can establish new neural representations even in the adult's brain. However, contingent motion aftereffect has been reported only in visual or auditory domain. Here, we demonstrate that a visual motion aftereffect can be contingent on a specific sound.
RESULTS: Dynamic random dots moving in an alternating right or left direction were presented to the participants. Each direction of motion was accompanied by an auditory tone of a unique and specific frequency. After a 3-minutes exposure, the tones began to exert marked influence on the visual motion perception, and the percentage of dots required to trigger motion perception systematically changed depending on the tones. Furthermore, this effect lasted for at least 2 days.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a new neural representation can be rapidly established between auditory and visual modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21569617      PMCID: PMC3118223          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Neurosci        ISSN: 1471-2202            Impact factor:   3.288


  23 in total

1.  Hearing visual motion in depth.

Authors:  Norimichi Kitagawa; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  When sound affects vision: effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception.

Authors:  K Watanabe; S Shimojo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

Review 3.  Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Alan Kingstone; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The ventriloquist in motion: illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Jessica Lyons; Michael Gazzaniga; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

5.  Visual motion influences the contingent auditory motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Jean Vroomen; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-07

6.  Visual motion perception induced by sounds in vertical plane.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Yuko Manaka; Souta Hidaka; Yoichi Sugita; Ryota Miyauchi; Shuichi Sakamoto; Jiro Gyoba; Yukio Iwaya; Yôiti Suzuki
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Audiovisual short-term influences and aftereffects in motion: examination across three sets of directional pairings.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Sharon L Sally; Thomas V Papathomas
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Alternation of sound location induces visual motion perception of a static object.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Yuko Manaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita; Ryota Miyauchi; Jiro Gyoba; Yôiti Suzuki; Yukio Iwaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Direction of visual apparent motion driven solely by timing of a static sound.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Jon Driver
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Sounds move a static visual object.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Souta Hidaka; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Vision contingent auditory pitch aftereffects.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Maori Kobayashi; Souta Hidaka; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of pitch-space correspondence on sound-induced visual motion perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Touch-contingent visual motion perception: tactile events drive visual motion perception.

Authors:  Ryo Teraoka; Wataru Teramoto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sound frequency and aural selectivity in sound-contingent visual motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Maori Kobayashi; Wataru Teramoto; Souta Hidaka; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Audiovisual associations alter the perception of low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Can Oluk
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-31

6.  Auditory Motion Elicits a Visual Motion Aftereffect.

Authors:  Christopher C Berger; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Congruent audio-visual stimulation during adaptation modulates the subsequently experienced visual motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Minsun Park; Randolph Blake; Yeseul Kim; Chai-Youn Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fooling the eyes: the influence of a sound-induced visual motion illusion on eye movements.

Authors:  Alessio Fracasso; Stefano Targher; Massimiliano Zampini; David Melcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Smelling directions: olfaction modulates ambiguous visual motion perception.

Authors:  Shenbing Kuang; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Spatiotemporal Processing in Crossmodal Interactions for Perception of the External World: A Review.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.