Literature DB >> 11894093

Hearing visual motion in depth.

Norimichi Kitagawa1, Shigeru Ichihara.   

Abstract

Auditory spatial perception is strongly affected by visual cues. For example, if auditory and visual stimuli are presented synchronously but from different positions, the auditory event is mislocated towards the locus of the visual stimulus-the ventriloquism effect. This 'visual capture' also occurs in motion perception in which a static auditory stimulus appears to move with the visual moving object. We investigated how the human perceptual system coordinates complementary inputs from auditory and visual senses. Here we show that an auditory aftereffect occurs from adaptation to visual motion in depth. After a few minutes of viewing a square moving in depth, a steady sound was perceived as changing loudness in the opposite direction. Adaptation to a combination of auditory and visual stimuli changing in a compatible direction increased the aftereffect and the effect of visual adaptation almost disappeared when the directions were opposite. On the other hand, listening to a sound changing in intensity did not affect the visual changing-size aftereffect. The results provide psychophysical evidence that, for processing of motion in depth, the auditory system responds to both auditory changing intensity and visual motion in depth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11894093     DOI: 10.1038/416172a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  54 in total

1.  Unimodal and crossmodal effects of endogenous attention to visual and auditory motion.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Proximal vocal threat recruits the right voice-sensitive auditory cortex.

Authors:  Leonardo Ceravolo; Sascha Frühholz; Didier Grandjean
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Hearing what the eyes see: auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences.

Authors:  Sharon E Guttman; Lee A Gilroy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-03

5.  Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Collision judgment of objects approaching the head.

Authors:  E Poljac; B Neggers; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The modulation of crossmodal integration by unimodal perceptual grouping: a visuotactile apparent motion study.

Authors:  Georgina Lyons; Daniel Sanabria; Argiro Vatakis; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Spatially congruent visual motion modulates activity of the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Mikhail Zvyagintsev; Andrey R Nikolaev; Heike Thönnessen; Olga Sachs; Jürgen Dammers; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Vision contingent auditory pitch aftereffects.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Maori Kobayashi; Souta Hidaka; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.