Literature DB >> 12763201

Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism.

Sharon Morein-Zamir1, Salvador Soto-Faraco, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

Four experiments investigated whether irrelevant sounds can influence the perception of lights in a visual temporal order judgment task, where participants judged which of two lights appeared first. In Experiment 1, presenting a sound before the first light and after the second light improved performance relative to baseline (sounds appearing simultaneously with the lights), as if the sounds pulled the perception of lights further apart in time. Experiment 2 ruled out an alerting explanation for this effect and indicated that the performance improvement resulted from the second sound trailing the second light. Experiment 3 excluded the possibility that leading or simultaneous sounds were interfering with performance and revealed that only the second sound had an effect within the temporal window known to support multisensory integration. Experiment 4 demonstrated that sounds intervening between the two lights led to a decline in performance, as if the sounds pulled the lights closer together. The results suggest a 'temporal ventriloquism' phenomenon analogous to spatial ventriloquism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12763201     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00089-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  98 in total

1.  Catching audiovisual mice: predicting the arrival time of auditory-visual motion signals.

Authors:  M Hofbauer; S M Wuerger; G F Meyer; F Roehrbein; K Schill; C Zetzsche
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Synchronization with competing visual and auditory rhythms: bouncing ball meets metronome.

Authors:  Michael J Hove; John R Iversen; Allen Zhang; Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-05-26

3.  Auditory temporal modulation of the visual Ternus effect: the influence of time interval.

Authors:  Zhuanghua Shi; Lihan Chen; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.

Authors:  Helene Intraub; Frank Morelli; Kristin M Gagnier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-02-25

6.  Cross-modal integration in a dart-poison frog.

Authors:  Peter M Narins; Daniela S Grabul; Kiran K Soma; Philippe Gaucher; Walter Hödl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Action enhances auditory but not visual temporal sensitivity.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

10.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.