Literature DB >> 21047763

Auditory modulation of visual apparent motion with short spatial and temporal intervals.

Hulusi Kafaligonul1, Gene R Stoner.   

Abstract

Recently, E. Freeman and J. Driver (2008) reported a cross-modal temporal interaction in which brief sounds drive the perceived direction of visual apparent-motion, an effect they attributed to "temporal capture" of the visual stimuli by the sounds (S. Morein-Zamir, S. Soto-Faraco, & A. Kingstone, 2003). Freeman and Driver used "long-range" visual motion stimuli, which travel over long spatial and temporal intervals and engage high-order cortical areas (K. G. Claeys, D. T. Lindsey, E. De Schutter, & G. A. Orban, 2003; Y. Zhuo et al., 2003). We asked whether Freeman and Driver's temporal effects extended to the short-range apparent-motion stimuli that engage cortical area MT, a lower-order area with well-established spatiotemporal selectivity for visual motion (e.g. A. Mikami, 1991, 1992; A. Mikami, W. T. Newsome, & R. H. Wurtz, 1986a, 1986b; W. T. Newsome, A. Mikami, & R. H. Wurtz, 1986). Consistent with a temporal-capture account, we found that static sounds bias the perception of both the direction (Experiment 1) and the speed (Experiment 2) of short-range motion. Our results suggest that auditory timing may interact with visual spatiotemporal processing as early as cortical area MT. Examination of the neuronal responses of this well-studied area to the stimuli used in this study would provide a test and might provide insight into the neuronal representation of time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047763      PMCID: PMC3144727          DOI: 10.1167/10.12.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  45 in total

1.  Response amplification in sensory-specific cortices during crossmodal binding.

Authors:  G A Calvert; M J Brammer; E T Bullmore; R Campbell; S D Iversen; A S David
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  The temporal cross-capture of audition and vision.

Authors:  R Fendrich; P M Corballis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-05

Review 3.  How do we tell time?

Authors:  Dean V Buonomano; Uma R Karmarkar
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.519

4.  Sensory and association cortex in time perception.

Authors:  Domenica Bueti; Bahador Bahrami; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Multimodal motion processing in area V5/MT: evidence from an artificial class of audio-visual events.

Authors:  Lukas Scheef; Henning Boecker; Marcel Daamen; Ursula Fehse; Martin W Landsberg; Dirk-Oliver Granath; Heinz Mechling; Alfred O Effenberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception.

Authors:  Richard B Ivry; John E Schlerf
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed.

Authors:  Sae Kaneko; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  The 'when' parietal pathway explored by lesion studies.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; Vincent Walsh; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Direction of visual apparent motion driven solely by timing of a static sound.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Jon Driver
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Contributions of the human temporoparietal junction and MT/V5+ to the timing of interception revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Mauro Carrozzo; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  8 in total

1.  Auditory modulation of spiking activity and local field potentials in area MT does not appear to underlie an audiovisual temporal illusion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Thomas D Albright; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Fast transfer of crossmodal time interval training.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Audiovisual associations alter the perception of low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Can Oluk
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-31

5.  The cross-modal double flash illusion depends on featural similarity between cross-modal inducers.

Authors:  Warrick Roseboom; Takahiro Kawabe; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Grouping by feature of cross-modal flankers in temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Michaela Klimova; Shin'ya Nishida; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Optimality and Limitations of Audio-Visual Integration for Cognitive Systems.

Authors:  William Paul Boyce; Anthony Lindsay; Arkady Zgonnikov; Iñaki Rañó; KongFatt Wong-Lin
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-07-17

8.  Does Sound Influence Perceived Duration of Visual Motion?

Authors:  Alessandro Carlini; Emmanuel Bigand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.