Literature DB >> 24903708

Low-dose radiation protocol using 3D mode in a BGO PET/CT.

Solange A Nogueira1, Renato Dimenstein, Marcelo L Cunha, Jairo Wagner, Marcelo B G Funari, Henrique M Lederman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) has brought about significant technological advancement in diagnostic imaging, and a number of PET/CT scanners with bismuth germanate detectors can perform imaging in both 2D and 3D acquisition modes. Nevertheless, certain image acquisition parameters and physical features of patients have to be considered when designing low-dose protocols in the 3D mode.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare images acquired in 2D and 3D modes and establish a low-dose protocol for use in PET/CT imaging, decreasing patient exposure to radiation without compromising results.
METHODS: A total of 30 patients, aged 4-72 years, participated in this prospective study, which was conducted at Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. Images were evaluated for picture quality, presence/absence of lesions and the number of lesions that were detectable in both acquisition modes.
RESULTS: The results consistently showed that the loss in image quality in the 3D mode did not affect exam interpretation and lesion detection when compared with 2D at higher dose and for a longer time.
CONCLUSIONS: We therefore conclude that administration of 3.7 MBq [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)/kg for an acquisition time of 3 min per FOV (field of view) is optimal for image acquisition in the 3D mode. This protocol, which reduces the acquisition time and radiation dose, is quite beneficial, especially for children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24903708     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-014-0422-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  24 in total

Review 1.  From PET detectors to PET scanners.

Authors:  John L Humm; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Alberto Del Guerra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Physical principles and technology of clinical PET imaging.

Authors:  D W Townsend
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.473

3.  Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.

Authors:  V Bettinardi; P Mancosu; M Danna; G Giovacchini; C Landoni; M Picchio; M C Gilardi; A Savi; I Castiglioni; M Lecchi; F Fazio
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.346

4.  Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes.

Authors:  L R Macdonald; R E Schmitz; A M Alessio; S D Wollenweber; C W Stearns; A Ganin; R L Harrison; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Minimizing and communicating radiation risk in pediatric nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; S Ted Treves; S James Adelstein
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2012-03

6.  Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study.

Authors:  Benjamin S Halpern; Magnus Dahlbom; Martin A Auerbach; Christiaan Schiepers; Barbara J Fueger; Wolfgang A Weber; Daniel H S Silverman; Osman Ratib; Johannes Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans.

Authors:  Charles C Watson; Michael E Casey; Bernard Bendriem; Jonathan P Carney; David W Townsend; Stefan Eberl; Steve Meikle; Frank P Difilippo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Comparison of imaging protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in overweight patients: optimizing scan duration versus administered dose.

Authors:  Yoko Masuda; Chisato Kondo; Yuka Matsuo; Masataka Uetani; Kiyoko Kusakabe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk.

Authors:  Bingsheng Huang; Martin Wai-Ming Law; Pek-Lan Khong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Comparison of 2D and 3D performance for FDG PET with different acquisition times in oncological patients.

Authors:  Gaber Komar; Mika Teräs; Marko Seppänen; Jussi Hirvonen; Tero Vahlberg; Jörgen Bergman; Heikki Minn
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  Positron emission tomography PET/CT harmonisation study of different clinical PET/CT scanners using commercially available software.

Authors:  Gerry Lowe; Bruce Spottiswoode; Jerome Declerck; Keith Sullivan; Mhd Saeed Sharif; Wai-Lup Wong; Bal Sanghera
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2020-06-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.