Literature DB >> 32335787

Monte Carlo simulation of digital photon counting PET.

Julien Salvadori1,2, Joey Labour3, Freddy Odille4, Pierre-Yves Marie5,6, Jean-Noël Badel3, Laëtitia Imbert4,5, David Sarrut3.   

Abstract

A GATE Monte Carlo model of the Philips Vereos digital photon counting PET imaging system using silicon photo-multiplier detectors was proposed. It was evaluated against experimental data in accordance with NEMA guidelines. Comparisons were performed using listmode data in order to remain independent of image reconstruction algorithms. An original line of response-based method is proposed to estimate intrinsic spatial resolution without reconstruction. Four sets of experiments were performed: (1) count rates and scatter fraction, (2) energy and timing resolutions, (3) sensitivity, and (4) intrinsic spatial resolution. Experimental and simulated data were found to be in good agreement, with overall differences lower than 10% for activity concentrations used in most standard clinical applications. Illustrative image reconstructions were provided. In conclusion, the proposed Monte Carlo model was validated and can be used for numerous studies such as optimizing acquisition parameters or reconstruction algorithms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital photon counting; Monte Carlo simulation; NEMA; PET

Year:  2020        PMID: 32335787      PMCID: PMC7183520          DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00288-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EJNMMI Phys        ISSN: 2197-7364


  39 in total

1.  Data acquisition in PET imaging.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2002-06

2.  PETSIM: Monte Carlo simulation of all sensitivity and resolution parameters of cylindrical positron imaging systems.

Authors:  C J Thompson; J Moreno-Cantu; Y Picard
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality.

Authors:  David Brasse; Paul E Kinahan; Carole Lartizien; Claude Comtat; Mike Casey; Christian Michel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Validation of GATE Monte Carlo simulations of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanners.

Authors:  C Ross Schmidtlein; Assen S Kirov; Sadek A Nehmeh; Yusuf E Erdi; John L Humm; Howard I Amols; Luc M Bidaut; Alex Ganin; Charles W Stearns; David L McDaniel; Klaus A Hamacher
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Monte Carlo simulations of clinical PET and SPECT scans: impact of the input data on the simulated images.

Authors:  S Stute; T Carlier; K Cristina; C Noblet; A Martineau; B Hutton; L Barnden; I Buvat
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Validation of the SimSET simulation package for modeling the Siemens Biograph mCT PET scanner.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; Michael E Casey; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  CASToR: a generic data organization and processing code framework for multi-modal and multi-dimensional tomographic reconstruction.

Authors:  Thibaut Merlin; Simon Stute; Didier Benoit; Julien Bert; Thomas Carlier; Claude Comtat; Marina Filipovic; Frédéric Lamare; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Comparison of image quality and lesion detection between digital and analog PET/CT.

Authors:  Diego Alfonso López-Mora; Albert Flotats; Francisco Fuentes-Ocampo; Valle Camacho; Alejandro Fernández; Agustí Ruiz; Joan Duch; Marina Sizova; Anna Domènech; Montserrat Estorch; Ignasi Carrió
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Geant4 physics list comparison for the simulation of phase-contrast mammography (XPulse project).

Authors:  V Beaudoux; G Blin; B Barbrel; G Kantor; C Zacharatou
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.685

View more
  3 in total

1.  Validation of a computational chain from PET Monte Carlo simulations to reconstructed images.

Authors:  Philip Kalaitzidis; Johan Gustafsson; Cecilia Hindorf; Michael Ljungberg
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 2.  Shining Damaged Hearts: Immunotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity in the Spotlight of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  David Kersting; Stephan Settelmeier; Ilektra-Antonia Mavroeidi; Ken Herrmann; Robert Seifert; Christoph Rischpler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Yttrium-90 quantitative phantom study using digital photon counting PET.

Authors:  Joey Labour; Philippe Boissard; David Sarrut; Jean-Noël Badel; Thomas Baudier; Fouzi Khayi; David Kryza; Pascale Veyrat Durebex; Sandrine Parisse-Di Martino; Thomas Mognetti
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-07-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.