Literature DB >> 15073270

A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols.

Carole Lartizien1, Paul E Kinahan, Claude Comtat.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared the impact of 2-dimensional (2D) and fully 3-dimensional (3D) acquisition modes on the performance of human observers in detecting and localizing tumors in whole-body (18)F-FDG images.
METHODS: We selected protocols based on noise equivalent count (NEC) rates derived from a series of 2D and fully 3D whole-body patient and phantom acquisitions on a dual-mode PET scanner. The fully 3D peak NEC value for a standard 70-kg patient was achieved for an injected dose of approximately 444 MBq (12 mCi) assuming a 90-min delay before acquisition, whereas the 2D peak value was never reached. The protocols were therefore set to those corresponding to a 444-MBq injected dose in fully 3D and 2D and a 740-MBq (20 mCi) injected dose in 2D that was considered as the maximum allowable dose. We used a non-Monte Carlo simulator to generate multiple realizations of whole-body PET data based on the geometry of the mathematic cardiac torso phantom (MCAT) with accurate noise properties. Two-dimensional and fully 3D acquisition times were set to 5 min per bed position. Spherical 1-cm-diameter lesions (targets) with random locations and contrasts were distributed in different organs. The simulated 2D datasets were reconstructed using attenuation-weighted ordered-subsets expectation maximization ((AW)OSEM) and the fully 3D datasets were reconstructed with FORE+(AW)OSEM (FORE = Fourier rebinning). Five human observers located and ranked the targets using a volumetric display of the whole-body PET data to replicate the clinical practice. An alternate free-response operating characteristic (AFROC) analysis of the human observer reports was performed for each protocol and each organ separately.
RESULTS: The 2D protocol corresponding to 740-MBq injected dose allowed the overall best detection performance. It was followed by the fully 3D acquisition at the peak fully 3D NEC rate from a 444-MBq injected dose. A 2D acquisition corresponding to a 444-MBq injected dose was ranked last. Differences in detection performance were organ specific.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that, for this patient size and scanner type, the fully 3D acquisition mode allowed better or equivalent detection performance than the 2D mode for an injected dose corresponding to the peak fully 3D NEC rate. The 2D acquisition protocol combined with a higher injected dose resulted in the highest detectabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15073270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  14 in total

1.  Image Reconstruction for a Partially Collimated Whole Body PET Scanner.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Ruth E Schmitz; Lawrence R Macdonald; Scott D Wollenweber; Charles W Stearns; Steven G Ross; Alex Ganin; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.679

2.  Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes.

Authors:  L R Macdonald; R E Schmitz; A M Alessio; S D Wollenweber; C W Stearns; A Ganin; R L Harrison; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Christoph Hoeschen; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark P Little
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; M Bugrahan Oktay; Michael E Casey; James J Hamill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.679

5.  Clinical evaluation of 2D versus 3D whole-body PET image quality using a dedicated BGO PET scanner.

Authors:  D Visvikis; D Griffiths; D C Costa; J Bomanji; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Pulmonary imaging using respiratory motion compensated simultaneous PET/MR.

Authors:  Joyita Dutta; Chuan Huang; Quanzheng Li; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Improvement in lesion detection with whole-body oncologic time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Georges El Fakhri; Suleman Surti; Cathryn M Trott; Joshua Scheuermann; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Multi-Level Canonical Correlation Analysis for Standard-Dose PET Image Estimation.

Authors:  Ehsan Adeli; David S Lalush
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 10.856

9.  Evaluation of Multiclass Model Observers in PET LROC Studies.

Authors:  H C Gifford; P E Kinahan; C Lartizien; M A King
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.679

10.  Efficient visual-search model observers for PET.

Authors:  H C Gifford
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.