Literature DB >> 26797797

Acquisition time optimization of positron emission tomography studies by use of a regression function derived from torso cross-sections and noise-equivalent counts.

Yoshiharu Kangai1,2, Hideo Onishi3.   

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to optimize the positron emission tomography (PET) acquisition time for individual patients by employing a regression function derived from torso cross-sections by using computed tomography (CT) attenuation corrections and the noise-equivalent counts (NECs). We initially determined the standard image quality or the standard NEC at our institution by visually assessing the images acquired from 61 patients. We measured the NECs of the livers and the torso cross-sections of 165 patients who were evaluated with PET/CT with (18)F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose on the basis of our standard protocol of 120 s/bed position. The optimal acquisition time (OPT) was calculated as the product of the ratio of the standard NEC to the estimated NEC multiplied by 120 s. The estimated NEC was derived from the oval cross-section of each patient by use of the regression function. We evaluated the validity of the OPT equation in 59 additional patients. We determined 5.83 Mcounts as the standard NEC at our institution. The mean OPTs in a group of 59 patients of whom 20, 19, and 20 were underweight, normal-weight, and overweight, respectively, were 106.3 ± 18.0, 137.1 ± 4.6, and 172.1 ± 24.3 s, respectively. After optimization, the NECs for normal-weight and overweight patients increased by 14 and 43 %, respectively, compared with the NECs attained with use of the conventional acquisition time (120 s). Using the regression function based on the torso cross-sections and the NECs enabled optimizations of the PET acquisition times for individual patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; Computed tomography; Diagnosis; Image acquisition; Obesity; Radioactivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26797797     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-016-0345-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  24 in total

1.  [Optimization of the scan time is based on the physical index in FDG-PET/CT].

Authors:  Naoki Shimada; Hiromitsu Daisaki; Takeshi Murano; Takashi Terauchi; Hiroyuki Shinohara; Noriyuki Moriyama
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006.

Authors:  Johannes Czernin; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes.

Authors:  L R Macdonald; R E Schmitz; A M Alessio; S D Wollenweber; C W Stearns; A Ganin; R L Harrison; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Model-based scatter correction for fully 3D PET.

Authors:  J M Ollinger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Patient weight-based acquisition protocols to optimize (18)F-FDG PET/CT image quality.

Authors:  Akio Nagaki; Masahisa Onoguchi; Norikazu Matsutomo
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2011-05-12

6.  Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study.

Authors:  Benjamin S Halpern; Magnus Dahlbom; Martin A Auerbach; Christiaan Schiepers; Barbara J Fueger; Wolfgang A Weber; Daniel H S Silverman; Osman Ratib; Johannes Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Effect of patient arm motion in whole-body PET/CT.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge; Joyce C Mhlanga; Steve Y Cho; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Comparison of imaging protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in overweight patients: optimizing scan duration versus administered dose.

Authors:  Yoko Masuda; Chisato Kondo; Yuka Matsuo; Masataka Uetani; Kiyoko Kusakabe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Evaluation of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET for staging in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Daisuke Uesaka; Yoshiki Demura; Takeshi Ishizaki; Shingo Ameshima; Isamu Miyamori; Masato Sasaki; Yasuhisa Fujibayashi; Hidehiko Okazawa
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Evaluation of noise equivalent count parameters as indicators of adult whole-body FDG-PET image quality.

Authors:  Garry M McDermott; Fahmid U Chowdhury; Andrew F Scarsbrook
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.