Literature DB >> 18509712

Accuracy of model-based RSA contour reduction in a typical clinical application.

Christof Hurschler1, Frank Seehaus, Judith Emmerich, Bart L Kaptein, Henning Windhagen.   

Abstract

Marker-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) is an accurate method for measuring in vivo implant migration, which requires attachment of tantalum markers to the implant. Model-based RSA allows migration measurement without implant markers; digital pose estimation, which can be thought of as casting a shadow of a surface model of the implant into the stereoradiographs, is used instead. The number of surface models required in a given clinical study depends on the number of implanted sizes and design variations of prostheses. Contour selection can be used to limit pose estimation to areas of the prosthesis that do not vary with design, reducing the number of surface models required. The effect of contour reduction on the accuracy of the model-based method was investigated using three different contour selection schemes on tibial components in 24 patients at 3 and 6 month followup. The agreement interval (mean +/- 2 standard deviations), which bounds the differences between the marker-based and model-based methods with contour reduction was smaller than -0.028 +/- 0.254 mm. The data suggest that contour reduction does not result in unacceptable loss of model-based RSA accuracy, and that the model-based method can be used interchangeably with the marker-based method for measuring tibial component migration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18509712      PMCID: PMC2584241          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0287-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  Model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  E R Valstar; F W de Jong; H A Vrooman; P M Rozing; J H Reiber
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A new model-based RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering.

Authors:  B L Kaptein; E R Valstar; B C Stoel; P M Rozing; J H C Reiber
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system.

Authors:  G Selvik
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

Review 4.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications.

Authors:  J Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1989-08

5.  Measurement accuracy in acetabular cup migration. A comparison of four radiologic methods versus roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  T Ilchmann; H Franzén; B Mjöberg; H Wingstrand
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses.

Authors:  J Kärrholm; B Borssén; G Löwenhielm; F Snorrason
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-11

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses.

Authors:  L Ryd; B E Albrektsson; L Carlsson; F Dansgård; P Herberts; A Lindstrand; L Regnér; S Toksvig-Larsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-05

9.  Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prostheses.

Authors:  M A Freeman; P Plante-Bordeneuve
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-05

10.  Micromotion of femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized study of cemented, hydroxyapatite-coated, and porous-coated stems with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  J Kärrholm; H Malchau; F Snorrason; P Herberts
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prosthetic component segmentation with blur compensation: a fast method for 3D fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Giacomo Tarroni; Luca Tersi; Cristiana Corsi; Rita Stagni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Static and dynamic error of a biplanar videoradiography system using marker-based and markerless tracking techniques.

Authors:  Daniel L Miranda; Joel B Schwartz; Andrew C Loomis; Elizabeth L Brainerd; Braden C Fleming; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Error performances of a model-based biplane fluoroscopic system for tracking knee prosthesis during treadmill gait task.

Authors:  Arnaud Barré; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Relationship of anterior knee laxity to knee translations during drop landings: a bi-plane fluoroscopy study.

Authors:  Michael R Torry; C Myers; W W Pennington; K B Shelburne; J P Krong; J E Giphart; J R Steadman; Savio L-Y Woo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  High knee valgus in female subjects does not yield higher knee translations during drop landings: a biplane fluoroscopic study.

Authors:  Michael R Torry; Kevin B Shelburne; Casey Myers; J Erik Giphart; W Wesley Pennington; Jacob P Krong; Daniel S Peterson; J Richard Steadman; Savio L-Y Woo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Adherence of hip and knee arthroplasty studies to RSA standardization guidelines. A systematic review.

Authors:  Rami Madanat; Tatu J Mäkinen; Hannu T Aro; Charles Bragdon; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Uncemented short stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: The state of the art.

Authors:  Mattia Loppini; Guido Grappiolo
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.