Literature DB >> 11470108

Model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of orthopaedic implants.

E R Valstar1, F W de Jong, H A Vrooman, P M Rozing, J H Reiber.   

Abstract

Attaching tantalum markers to prostheses for Roentgen stereophotogrammetry (RSA) may be difficult and is sometimes even impossible. In this study, a model-based RSA method that avoids the attachment of markers to prostheses is presented and validated. This model-based RSA method uses a triangulated surface model of the implant. A projected contour of this model is calculated and this calculated model contour is matched onto the detected contour of the actual implant in the RSA radiograph. The difference between the two contours is minimized by variation of the position and orientation of the model. When a minimal difference between the contours is found, an optimal position and orientation of the model has been obtained. The method was validated by means of a phantom experiment. Three prosthesis components were used in this experiment: the femoral and tibial component of an Interax total knee prosthesis (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Rutherfort, USA) and the femoral component of a Profix total knee prosthesis (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, USA). For the prosthesis components used in this study, the accuracy of the model-based method is lower than the accuracy of traditional RSA. For the Interax femoral and tibial components, significant dimensional tolerances were found that were probably caused by the casting process and manual polishing of the components surfaces. The largest standard deviation for any translation was 0.19mm and for any rotation it was 0.52 degrees. For the Profix femoral component that had no large dimensional tolerances, the largest standard deviation for any translation was 0.22mm and for any rotation it was 0.22 degrees. From this study we may conclude that the accuracy of the current model-based RSA method is sensitive to dimensional tolerances of the implant. Research is now being conducted to make model-based RSA less sensitive to dimensional tolerances and thereby improving its accuracy.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11470108     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00028-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

1.  Three-dimensional point localisation in low-dose X-ray images using stereo-photogrammetry.

Authors:  T S Douglas; C L Vaughan; S M Wynne
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Analysis of migration of the Nanos® short-stem hip implant within two years after surgery.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Frank Seehaus; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thilo Floerkemeier; Henning Windhagen; Yvonne Noll; Max Ettinger; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A 3D kinematic estimation of knee prosthesis using X-ray projection images: clinical assessment of the improved algorithm for fluoroscopy images.

Authors:  Shunji Hirokawa; M Abrar Hossain; Yuichi Kihara; Shogo Ariyoshi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Accuracy of model-based RSA contour reduction in a typical clinical application.

Authors:  Christof Hurschler; Frank Seehaus; Judith Emmerich; Bart L Kaptein; Henning Windhagen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  CORR Insights®: Radiostereometric Analysis Permits In Vivo Measurement of Very Small Levels of Wear in TKA.

Authors:  Robert H Hopper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Predicting 3D pose in partially overlapped X-ray images of knee prostheses using model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA).

Authors:  Chi-Pin Hsu; Shang-Chih Lin; Kao-Shang Shih; Chang-Hung Huang; Chian-Her Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Radiostereometric Analysis Permits In Vivo Measurement of Very Small Levels of Wear in TKA.

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Jacob Wihlidal; Richard W McCalden; Xunhua Yuan; Steven J MacDonald; Brent A Lanting; Douglas D Naudie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Radiostereometric analysis of keeled versus pegged glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized feasibility study.

Authors:  Trevor C Gascoyne; Sheila M B McRae; Sara L Parashin; Jeff R S Leiter; Martin J Petrak; Eric R Bohm; Peter B MacDonald
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Pose estimation of artificial hip joint using a single radiographic projection.

Authors:  H Inaoka; A Ishidal; Y Fukuoka; K Suzuki; M Matsubara
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Computer assisted versus conventional cemented total knee prostheses alignment accuracy and micromotion of the tibial component.

Authors:  Thisbe van Strien; Enrike van der Linden-van der Zwaag; Bart Kaptein; Arjan van Erkel; Edward Valstar; Rob Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.