Literature DB >> 18479482

Area under the free-response ROC curve (FROC) and a related summary index.

Andriy I Bandos1, Howard E Rockette, Tao Song, David Gur.   

Abstract

Free-response assessment of diagnostic systems continues to gain acceptance in areas related to the detection, localization, and classification of one or more "abnormalities" within a subject. A free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve is a tool for characterizing the performance of a free-response system at all decision thresholds simultaneously. Although the importance of a single index summarizing the entire curve over all decision thresholds is well recognized in ROC analysis (e.g., area under the ROC curve), currently there is no widely accepted summary of a system being evaluated under the FROC paradigm. In this article, we propose a new index of the free-response performance at all decision thresholds simultaneously, and develop a nonparametric method for its analysis. Algebraically, the proposed summary index is the area under the empirical FROC curve penalized for the number of erroneous marks, rewarded for the fraction of detected abnormalities, and adjusted for the effect of the target size (or "acceptance radius"). Geometrically, the proposed index can be interpreted as a measure of average performance superiority over an artificial "guessing" free-response process and it represents an analogy to the area between the ROC curve and the "guessing" or diagonal line. We derive the ideal bootstrap estimator of the variance, which can be used for a resampling-free construction of asymptotic bootstrap confidence intervals and for sample size estimation using standard expressions. The proposed procedure is free from any parametric assumptions and does not require an assumption of independence of observations within a subject. We provide an example with a dataset sampled from a diagnostic imaging study and conduct simulations that demonstrate the appropriateness of the developed procedure for the considered sample sizes and ranges of parameters.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18479482      PMCID: PMC2776072          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01049.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

1.  Use of the Mann-Whitney U-test for clustered data.

Authors:  B Rosner; D Grove
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Bootstrap estimation of diagnostic accuracy with patient-clustered data.

Authors:  C M Rutter
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.

Authors:  Darrin C Edwards; Matthew A Kupinski; Charles E Metz; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  K S Berbaum; E A Franken; D D Dorfman; S A Rooholamini; M H Kathol; T J Barloon; F M Behlke; Y Sato; C H Lu; G Y el-Khoury
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

  10 in total
  27 in total

1.  Quantifying the clinical relevance of a laboratory observer performance paradigm.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; T M Haygood; J Ryan; E M Marom; M Evanoff; M F McEntee; P C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems.

Authors:  Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Samuel G Armato; Alberto Bert; Loredana Correale; Silvia Delsanto; Matthew T Freedman; David Fryd; David Gur; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Zhimin Huo; Yulei Jiang; Lia Morra; Sophie Paquerault; Vikas Raykar; Frank Samuelson; Ronald M Summers; Georgia Tourassi; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Bin Zheng; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A prediction model of simple echocardiographic variables to screen for potentially correctable shunts in adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with atrial septal defects: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mingqi Li; Yu Wang; Hezhi Li; Yigao Huang; Tao Huang; Caojin Zhang; Hongwen Fei
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  A multiobjective Bayesian networks approach for joint prediction of tumor local control and radiation pneumonitis in nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for response-adapted radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yi Luo; Daniel L McShan; Martha M Matuszak; Dipankar Ray; Theodore S Lawrence; Shruti Jolly; Feng-Ming Kong; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  3D deep learning for detecting pulmonary nodules in CT scans.

Authors:  Ross Gruetzemacher; Ashish Gupta; David Paradice
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Subject-centered free-response ROC (FROC) analysis.

Authors:  Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  New developments in observer performance methodology in medical imaging.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 8.  A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Counterpoint to "Performance assessment of diagnostic systems under the FROC paradigm" by Gur and Rockette.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Performance assessments of diagnostic systems under the FROC paradigm: experimental, analytical, and results interpretation issues.

Authors:  David Gur; Howard E Rockette
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.