Literature DB >> 10399203

Use of the Mann-Whitney U-test for clustered data.

B Rosner1, D Grove.   

Abstract

The Mann-Whitney U-test is ubiquitous in statistical practice for the comparison of measures of location for two samples where the assumption of normality is questionable. Frequently, one has replicate data for each individual in a group and would like to compare measures of central tendency between groups without assuming normality. For this purpose, we present a generalization of the Mann-Whitney U-test for clustered data. The test is performed by computing zc = (Wc - mu c)/sigma c, approximately N(0, 1) under H0, where Wc, mu c are the observed and expected Mann-Whitney U-statistic based on a comparison of all pairs of replicates in the two groups and sigma c is the standard deviation of Wc that is modified to account for clustering effects within a cluster. We obtain an explicit variance formula that is a function of four clustering parameters. We validate the properties of the test procedure in a simulation study. We illustrate the methods with an example comparing the baseline Humphrey visual field between two treatment groups in a randomized clinical trial of patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10399203     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990615)18:11<1387::aid-sim126>3.0.co;2-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  17 in total

1.  A study of clustered data and approaches to its analysis.

Authors:  Sally Galbraith; James A Daniel; Bryce Vissel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Area under the free-response ROC curve (FROC) and a related summary index.

Authors:  Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; Tao Song; David Gur
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Is the male gender an independent risk factor for complication in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis?

Authors:  Peter C Ambe; Lothar Köhler
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

4.  Two-sample test for correlated data under outcome-dependent sampling with an application to self-reported weight loss data.

Authors:  Yi Cai; Jing Huang; Jing Ning; Mei-Ling Ting Lee; Bernard Rosner; Yong Chen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Functional analysis of two matrix attachment region (MAR) elements in transgenic maize plants.

Authors:  Lyudmila Sidorenko; Wesley Bruce; Sheila Maddock; Laura Tagliani; Xianggan Li; Michael Daniels; Thomas Peterson
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Phytolith analysis for differentiating between foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis).

Authors:  Jianping Zhang; Houyuan Lu; Naiqin Wu; Xiaoyan Yang; Xianmin Diao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A General Class of Signed Rank Tests for Clustered Data when the Cluster Size is Potentially Informative.

Authors:  Somnath Datta; Jaakko Nevalainen; Hannu Oja
Journal:  J Nonparametr Stat       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 1.231

8.  A new correlation clustering method for cancer mutation analysis.

Authors:  Jack P Hou; Amin Emad; Gregory J Puleo; Jian Ma; Olgica Milenkovic
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Presence of organophosphorus pesticide oxygen analogs in air samples.

Authors:  Jenna L Armstrong; Richard A Fenske; Michael G Yost; Kit Galvin; Maria Tchong-French; Jianbo Yu
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  The efficacy of Ritalin in ADHD children under neurofeedback training.

Authors:  Fatemeh Pakdaman; Fatemeh Irani; Fakhri Tajikzadeh; Samaneh Amani Jabalkandi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.