Literature DB >> 16825742

A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm.

D P Chakraborty1.   

Abstract

Search is a basic activity that is performed routinely in many different tasks. In the context of medical imaging it involves locating lesions in images under conditions of uncertainty regarding the number and locations of lesions that may be present. A search model is presented that applies to situations, as in the free-response paradigm, where on each image the number of normal regions that could be mistaken for lesions is unknown, and the number of observer generated localizations of suspicious regions (marks) is unpredictable. The search model is based on a two-stage model that has been proposed in the literature, according to which, at the first stage (the preattentive stage) the observer uses mainly peripheral vision to identify likely lesion candidates, and at the second stage the observer decides (i.e., cognitively evaluates) whether or not to report the candidates. The search model regards the unpredictable numbers of lesion and non-lesion localizations as random variables and models them via appropriate statistical distributions. The model has three parameters quantifying the lesion signal-to-noise ratio, the observer's expertise at rejecting non-lesion locations, and the observer's expertise at finding lesions. A figure-of-merit quantifying the observer's search performance is described. The search model bears a close resemblance to the initial detection and candidate analysis (IDCA) model that has been recently proposed for analysing computer aided detection (CAD) algorithms. The ability to analytically model and quantify the search process would enable more powerful assessment and optimization of performance in these activities, which could be highly significant.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825742      PMCID: PMC2230665          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/14/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  26 in total

1.  Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.

Authors:  Darrin C Edwards; Matthew A Kupinski; Charles E Metz; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection.

Authors:  C F Nodine; H L Kundel
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; E S Breatnach; M V Yester; B Soto; G T Barnes; R G Fraser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  A visual concept shapes image perception.

Authors:  H L Kundel; C F Nodine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Search through a sequentially presented visual display.

Authors:  J E Hoffman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-01
View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

2.  Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.

Authors:  Dev Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Model for the detection of signals in images with multiple suspicious locations.

Authors:  Lucreţiu M Popescu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems.

Authors:  Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Samuel G Armato; Alberto Bert; Loredana Correale; Silvia Delsanto; Matthew T Freedman; David Fryd; David Gur; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Zhimin Huo; Yulei Jiang; Lia Morra; Sophie Paquerault; Vikas Raykar; Frank Samuelson; Ronald M Summers; Georgia Tourassi; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Bin Zheng; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  On comparing methods for discriminating between actually negative and actually positive subjects with FROC type data.

Authors:  Tao Song; Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Area under the free-response ROC curve (FROC) and a related summary index.

Authors:  Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; Tao Song; David Gur
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.

Authors:  Federica Zanca; Stephen L Hillis; Filip Claus; Chantal Van Ongeval; Valerie Celis; Veerle Provoost; Hong-Jun Yoon; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  A status report on free-response analysis.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.