Literature DB >> 9192452

Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data.

N A Obuchowski1.   

Abstract

Current methods for estimating the accuracy of diagnostic tests require independence of the test results in the sample. However, cases in which there are multiple test results from the same patient are quite common. In such cases, estimation and inference of the accuracy of diagnostic tests must account for intracluster correlation. In the present paper, the structural components method of DeLong, DeLong, and Clarke-Pearson (1988, Biometrics 44, 837-844) is extended to the estimation of the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve area for clustered data, incorporating the concepts of design effect and effective sample size used by Rao and Scott (1992, Biometrics 48, 577-585) for clustered binary data. Results of a Monte Carlo simulation study indicate that the size of statistical tests that assume independence is inflated in the presence of intracluster correlation. The proposed method, on the other hand, appropriately handles a wide variety of intracluster correlations, e.g., correlations between true disease statuses and between test results. In addition, the method can be applied to both continuous and ordinal test results. A strategy for estimating sample size requirements for future studies using clustered data is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9192452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  105 in total

1.  Accuracy of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions-based ototoxicity monitoring using various primary frequency step-sizes.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Homogeneity tests of clustered diagnostic markers with applications to the BioCycle Study.

Authors:  Liansheng Larry Tang; Aiyi Liu; Enrique F Schisterman; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Catherine Chun-Ling Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Evaluating imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis devices at the FDA.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Heang-Ping Chan; Carl J D'Orsi; Lori E Dodd; Maryellen L Giger; David Gur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Charles E Metz; Kyle J Myers; Nancy A Obuchowski; Berkman Sahiner; Alicia Y Toledano; Margarita L Zuley
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  The Clinical Utility of Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) Serum Levels as a Biomarker for Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC).

Authors:  Linde M van Veenendaal; Eduardo Bertolli; Catharina M Korse; W Martin C Klop; Margot E T Tesselaar; Alexander C J van Akkooi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Reducing the influence of b-value selection on diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: evaluation of a revised monoexponential model within a clinical setting.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Debra A Goldman; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Nonparametric sequential evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Aiyi Liu; Chengqing Wu; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Ventricular Fibrillation Waveform Analysis During Chest Compressions to Predict Survival From Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Jason Coult; Jennifer Blackwood; Lawrence Sherman; Thomas D Rea; Peter J Kudenchuk; Heemun Kwok
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01

8.  Restriction spectrum imaging improves MRI-based prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Kevin C McCammack; Natalie M Schenker-Ahmed; Nathan S White; Shaun R Best; Robert M Marks; Jared Heimbigner; Christopher J Kane; J Kellogg Parsons; Joshua M Kuperman; Hauke Bartsch; Rahul S Desikan; Rebecca A Rakow-Penner; Michael A Liss; Daniel J A Margolis; Steven S Raman; Ahmed Shabaik; Anders M Dale; David S Karow
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

9.  Discriminant value of custom ocular response analyzer waveform derivatives in keratoconus.

Authors:  Katie M Hallahan; Abhijit Sinha Roy; Renato Ambrosio; Marcella Salomao; William J Dupps
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Mapping of macular substructures with optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Ou Tan; Gisèle Li; Ake Tzu-Hui Lu; Rohit Varma; David Huang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.