Literature DB >> 19268864

Counterpoint to "Performance assessment of diagnostic systems under the FROC paradigm" by Gur and Rockette.

Dev P Chakraborty1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19268864      PMCID： PMC2671808          DOI： 10.1016/j.acra.2008.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN： 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Bootstrap estimation of diagnostic accuracy with patient-clustered data.

Authors:  C M Rutter
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Computer-aided detection in mammography.

Authors:  S M Astley; F J Gilbert
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  The efficacy of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  D G Fryback; J R Thornbury
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  On comparing methods for discriminating between actually negative and actually positive subjects with FROC type data.

Authors:  Tao Song; Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Area under the free-response ROC curve (FROC) and a related summary index.

Authors:  Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; Tao Song; David Gur
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Local versus global measures of accuracy: an important distinction for diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  W C Black; A J Dwyer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1990 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Stephen H Taplin; Patricia A Carney; Linn Abraham; Edward A Sickles; Carl D'Orsi; Eric A Berns; Gary Cutter; R Edward Hendrick; William E Barlow; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Assessment methodologies and statistical issues for computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodules in computed tomography: contemporary research topics relevant to the lung image database consortium.

Authors:  Lori E Dodd; Robert F Wagner; Samuel G Armato; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Sergey Beiden; Heang-Ping Chan; David Gur; Geoffrey McLennan; Charles E Metz; Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Jim Sayre
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173
View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantifying the clinical relevance of a laboratory observer performance paradigm.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; T M Haygood; J Ryan; E M Marom; M Evanoff; M F McEntee; P C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Measuring agreement between rating interpretations and binary clinical interpretations of images: a simulation study of methods for quantifying the clinical relevance of an observer performance paradigm.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Clinical relevance of the ROC and free-response paradigms for comparing imaging system efficacies.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 0.972
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.