Literature DB >> 12512721

Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.

Darrin C Edwards1, Matthew A Kupinski, Charles E Metz, Robert M Nishikawa.   

Abstract

We have developed a model for FROC curve fitting that relates the observer's FROC performance not to the ROC performance that would be obtained if the observer's responses were scored on a per image basis, but rather to a hypothesized ROC performance that the observer would obtain in the task of classifying a set of "candidate detections" as positive or negative. We adopt the assumptions of the Bunch FROC model, namely that the observer's detections are all mutually independent, as well as assumptions qualitatively similar to, but different in nature from, those made by Chakraborty in his AFROC scoring methodology. Under the assumptions of our model, we show that the observer's FROC performance is a linearly scaled version of the candidate analysis ROC curve, where the scaling factors are just given by the FROC operating point coordinates for detecting initial candidates. Further, we show that the likelihood function of the model parameters given observational data takes on a simple form, and we develop a maximum likelihood method for fitting a FROC curve to this data. FROC and AFROC curves are produced for computer vision observer datasets and compared with the results of the AFROC scoring method. Although developed primarily with computer vision schemes in mind, we hope that the methodology presented here will prove worthy of further study in other applications as well.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12512721     DOI: 10.1118/1.1524631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  26 in total

Review 1.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

2.  Assessing operating characteristics of CAD algorithms in the absence of a gold standard.

Authors:  Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; David S Paik; Chin A Yi; Sandy Napel; Justus Roos; Geoffrey D Rubin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Online mammographic images database for development and comparison of CAD schemes.

Authors:  Bruno Roberto Nepomuceno Matheus; Homero Schiabel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Evaluating imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis devices at the FDA.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Heang-Ping Chan; Carl J D'Orsi; Lori E Dodd; Maryellen L Giger; David Gur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Charles E Metz; Kyle J Myers; Nancy A Obuchowski; Berkman Sahiner; Alicia Y Toledano; Margarita L Zuley
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.

Authors:  Dev Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  A status report on free-response analysis.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.