Literature DB >> 21978444

New developments in observer performance methodology in medical imaging.

Dev P Chakraborty1.   

Abstract

A common task in medical imaging is assessing whether a new imaging system, or a variant of an existing one, is an improvement over an existing imaging technology. Imaging systems are generally quite complex, consisting of several components-for example, image acquisition hardware, image processing and display hardware and software, and image interpretation by radiologists- each of which can affect performance. Although it may appear odd to include the radiologist as a "component" of the imaging chain, because the radiologist's decision determines subsequent patient care, the effect of the human interpretation has to be included. Physical measurements such as modulation transfer function, signal-to-noise ratio, are useful for characterizing the nonhuman parts of the imaging chain under idealized and often unrealistic conditions, such as uniform background phantoms and target objects with sharp edges. Measuring the performance of the entire imaging chain, including the radiologist, and using real clinical images requires different methods that fall under the rubric of observer performance methods or "ROC" analysis, that involve collecting rating data on images. The purpose of this work is to review recent developments in this field, particularly with respect to the free-response method, where location information is also collected.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21978444      PMCID: PMC3196628          DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  49 in total

Review 1.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

2.  BI-RADS data should not be used to estimate ROC curves.

Authors:  Yulei Jiang; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  The place of statistical methods in radiology (and in the bigger picture).

Authors:  J A Hanley
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Power estimation for the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  6. Statistical analysis and power estimation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J ICRU       Date:  2008-04

7.  Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A visual concept shapes image perception.

Authors:  H L Kundel; C F Nodine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods.

Authors:  A E Burgess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  15 in total

1.  On the choice of acceptance radius in free-response observer performance studies.

Authors:  T M Haygood; J Ryan; P C Brennan; S Li; E M Marom; M F McEntee; M Itani; M Evanoff; D Chakraborty
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Quantifying the clinical relevance of a laboratory observer performance paradigm.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; T M Haygood; J Ryan; E M Marom; M Evanoff; M F McEntee; P C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems.

Authors:  Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Samuel G Armato; Alberto Bert; Loredana Correale; Silvia Delsanto; Matthew T Freedman; David Fryd; David Gur; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Zhimin Huo; Yulei Jiang; Lia Morra; Sophie Paquerault; Vikas Raykar; Frank Samuelson; Ronald M Summers; Georgia Tourassi; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Bin Zheng; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Re-evaluation of detectability of liver metastases by contrast-enhanced CT: added value of hepatic arterial phase imaging.

Authors:  Yukiko Honda; Toru Higaki; Haruka Higashihori; Yoshio Monzen; Fuminari Tatsugami; Shuji Date; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Ahmed K Abdullah; Judith Kelly; John D Thompson; Claire E Mercer; Rob Aspin; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Effect of radiation dose level on the detectability of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sara A Asplund; Åse A Johnsson; Jenny Vikgren; Angelica Svalkvist; Agneta Flinck; Marianne Boijsen; Valeria A Fisichella; Lars Gunnar Månsson; Magnus Båth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Digital Tomosynthesis, Dual-Energy Radiography, and Conventional Chest Radiography for the Detection and Management of Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; H Page McAdams; John M Sabol; Dev P Chakraborty; Ella A Kazerooni; Gautham P Reddy; Jenny Vikgren; Magnus Båth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Application of threshold-bias independent analysis to eye-tracking and FROC data.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  An optimised patient-specific approach to administration of contrast agent for CT pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  Charbel Saade; Roger Bourne; Fadi El-Merhi; Arjuna Somanathan; Dev Chakraborty; Patrick Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.