Literature DB >> 18397032

Pulse-rate discrimination by cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners with and without binaural cues.

Robert P Carlyon1, Christopher J Long, John M Deeks.   

Abstract

Experiment 1 measured rate discrimination of electric pulse trains by bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users, for standard rates of 100, 200, and 300 pps. In the diotic condition the pulses were presented simultaneously to the two ears. Consistent with previous results with unilateral stimulation, performance deteriorated at higher standard rates. In the signal interval of each trial in the dichotic condition, the standard rate was presented to the left ear and the (higher) signal rate was presented to the right ear; the non-signal intervals were the same as in the diotic condition. Performance in the dichotic condition was better for some listeners than in the diotic condition for standard rates of 100 and 200 pps, but not at 300 pps. It is concluded that the deterioration in rate discrimination observed for CI users at high rates cannot be alleviated by the introduction of a binaural cue, and is unlikely to be limited solely by central pitch processes. Experiment 2 performed an analogous experiment in which 300-pps acoustic pulse trains were bandpass filtered (3900-5400 Hz) and presented in a noise background to normal-hearing listeners. Unlike the results of experiment 1, performance was superior in the dichotic than in the diotic condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18397032      PMCID: PMC2376257          DOI: 10.1121/1.2874796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Cochlear phase and amplitude retrieved from the auditory nerve at arbitrary frequencies.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.

Authors:  Kaibao Nie; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Limitations on rate discrimination.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  S Pijl; D W Schwarz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals.

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differences.

Authors:  D W Grantham; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Binaural unmasking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Robert P Carlyon; Ruth Y Litovsky; Daniel H Downs
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-08-29

10.  Neural sensitivity to interaural envelope delays in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig.

Authors:  Sarah J Griffin; Leslie R Bernstein; Neil J Ingham; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  17 in total

1.  Temporal weighting of binaural cues revealed by detection of dynamic interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Andrew D Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of Aging on Perceptual and Electrophysiological Responses to Acoustic Pulse Trains as a Function of Rate.

Authors:  Casey Gaskins; Brittany N Jaekel; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants?

Authors:  Pieter J Venter; Johan J Hanekom
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-19

7.  Coding of electric pulse trains presented through cochlear implants in the auditory midbrain of awake rabbit: comparison with anesthetized preparations.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Kenneth E Hancock; Sung-Il Nam; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Median-plane sound localization as a function of the number of spectral channels using a channel vocoder.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Effects of aging and hearing loss on perceptual and electrophysiological measures of pulse-rate discrimination.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell; Ed Smith; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.