Literature DB >> 9714925

Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals.

C M McKay1, H J McDermott.   

Abstract

The effect of interpulse intervals on the perception of loudness of biphasic current pulse trains was investigated in eight adult cochlear implantees at three different stimulus levels encompassing the psychophysical dynamic range. Equal-loudness contours and thresholds were obtained for stimuli in which two biphasic pulses were presented in a fixed repetition period (4 and 20 ms), and also for single-pulse/period stimuli with rates varying between 20 and 750 Hz. All stimuli were of 500-ms duration, and the phase durations of each pulse were 100 microseconds or less. The results of these experiments were consistent with predictions of a three-stage model of loudness perception, consisting of a peripheral refractory effect function, a sliding central integration time window, and a central equal-loudness decision device. Application of the model to the data allowed the estimation of neural refractory characteristics of the subjects' remaining peripheral neural population. The average neural spike probability for a 50-Hz stimulus was predicted to be about 0.77, with an associated neural refractory time of 7.3 ms. These predictions did not vary systematically with level, implying that the effect of increasing current level on loudness results more from recruitment of neurons than from any increase in average spike probability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9714925     DOI: 10.1121/1.423316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  41 in total

1.  Encoding pitch contours using current steering.

Authors:  Xin Luo; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  [Refractory behaviour of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve].

Authors:  A Morsnowski; B Charasse; L Collet; M Killian; J Müller-Deile
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Neural integration and enhancement from the inferior colliculus up to different layers of auditory cortex.

Authors:  Malgorzata M Straka; Dillon Schendel; Hubert H Lim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 5.  Auditory midbrain implant: a review.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-09

6.  Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Katherine R Henshall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

7.  Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Casey T Kraft; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-20

8.  The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Responses in Patients with Auditory Brainstem Implants: Morphological Characteristics, Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Stimulation Level, and Association with Auditory Detection.

Authors:  Shuman He; Tyler C McFayden; Holly F B Teagle; Matthew Ewend; Lillian Henderson; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Temporal processing in the auditory system: insights from cochlear and auditory midbrain implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Hubert H Lim; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.