Literature DB >> 31026191

Effects of Aging on Perceptual and Electrophysiological Responses to Acoustic Pulse Trains as a Function of Rate.

Casey Gaskins1, Brittany N Jaekel1, Sandra Gordon-Salant1, Matthew J Goupell1, Samira Anderson1.   

Abstract

Purpose As pulse rate increases beyond a few hundred Hertz, younger normal-hearing (NH) participants' ability to encode temporal information in band-limited acoustic pulse trains decreases, demonstrating a rate limitation in processing rapid temporal information. Rate discrimination abilities, however, have yet to be investigated in older NH participants-a population that experiences age-related temporal processing deficits. It was hypothesized that age-related temporal processing deficits lead to decreased temporal rate discrimination abilities in older compared with younger NH participants, which could be observed in both perceptual and electrophysiological measurements. Method Fifteen younger and 15 older NH participants were presented acoustic pulse trains with a 4-kHz center frequency and 1-kHz bandwidth at 75 dB SPL monaurally. The pulse rate was 80, 200, or 400 Hz. Just noticeable differences were obtained using an adaptive procedure that instructed the participants to identify the pulse train with the highest pitch. Auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) were recorded to the same pulse trains with 2 additional rates-20 and 40 Hz. The Digit Symbol Coding and Digit Symbol Search subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale ( Wechsler, 1997 ) were measured as correlates to domain-general cognitive processing speed. Results As rate increased from 80 to 400 Hz, performance on the perceptual rate discrimination task worsened in both groups. ASSR spectral energy also decreased, but only in the older group. Perceptual performance was equivalent between groups across rates. The older group had lower ASSR spectral energy (lower signal-to-noise ratios) at the 400-Hz rate than the younger group, but there were no group differences for the other rates. The overall strength of neural rate representation, along with speed of processing performance, predicted perceptual performance for the 400-Hz rate. Conclusion These results suggest that neural representation at early levels of the auditory system and processing speed are factors in perceptual auditory temporal processing performance, especially in older adults.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31026191      PMCID: PMC6802875          DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-ASCC7-18-0133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  39 in total

1.  Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Anthony T Herdman; Otavio Lins; Patricia Van Roon; David R Stapells; Michael Scherg; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Restarting the adapted binaural system.

Authors:  E R Hafter; T N Buell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Jessica Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Amplitude modulation rate dependent topographic organization of the auditory steady-state response in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Nathan Weisz; Chrysoula Lithari
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Human auditory steady state potentials.

Authors:  D R Stapells; D Linden; J B Suffield; G Hamel; T W Picton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Detection of interaural differences of intensity in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number.

Authors:  E R Hafter; R H Dye; E Wenzel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Mark A Eckert; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Pulse-rate discrimination by cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners with and without binaural cues.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Long; John M Deeks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of aging and hearing loss on perceptual and electrophysiological measures of pulse-rate discrimination.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell; Ed Smith; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Peripheral deficits and phase-locking declines in aging adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Rebecca Bieber; Alanna Schloss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Gamma-Range Auditory Steady-State Responses and Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vykinta Parciauskaite; Jovana Bjekic; Inga Griskova-Bulanova
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-10

5.  Rate Discrimination Training May Partially Restore Temporal Processing Abilities from Age-Related Deficits.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsay DeVries; Edward Smith; Matthew J Goupell; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.