Literature DB >> 17471732

Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing.

Bernhard Laback1, Piotr Majdak, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner.   

Abstract

This study examined the sensitivity of four cochlear implant (CI) listeners to interaural time difference (ITD) in different portions of four-pulse sequences in lateralization discrimination. ITD was present either in all the pulses (referred to as condition Wave), the two middle pulses (Ongoing), the first pulse (Onset), the last pulse (Offset), or both the first and last pulse (Gating). All ITD conditions were tested at different pulse rates (100, 200, 400, and 800 pulses/s pps). Also, five normal hearing (NH) subjects were tested, listening to an acoustic simulation of CI stimulation. All CI and NH listeners were sensitive in condition Gating at all pulse rates for which they showed sensitivity in condition Wave. The sensitivity in condition Onset increased with the pulse rate for three CI listeners as well as for all NH listeners. The performance in condition Ongoing varied over the subjects. One CI listener showed sensitivity up to 800 pps, two up to 400 pps, and one at 100 pps only. The group of NH listeners showed sensitivity up to 200 pps. The result that CI listeners detect ITD from the middle pulses of short trains indicates the relevance of fine timing of stimulation pulses in lateralization and therefore in CI stimulation strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17471732     DOI: 10.1121/1.2642280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  39 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Katharina Egger; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-16

3.  Effect of multi-electrode configuration on sensitivity to interaural timing differences in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Review of recent work on spatial hearing skills in children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-05

5.  Sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to interaural time differences in the envelope versus the fine structure with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates.

Authors:  Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sensitivity to interaural time differences with combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Jan Brokx; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-02

8.  Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural Coding of Interaural Time Differences with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Unanesthetized Rabbits.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Gary L Jones; Smita Agrawal; Richard van Hoesel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.