Literature DB >> 31153315

Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.

Ann E Todd1, Matthew J Goupell2, Ruth Y Litovsky1.   

Abstract

For normal-hearing (NH) listeners, interaural information in both temporal envelope and temporal fine structure contribute to binaural unmasking of target signals in background noise; however, in many conditions low-frequency interaural information in temporal fine structure produces greater binaural unmasking. For bilateral cochlear-implant (CI) listeners, interaural information in temporal envelope contributes to binaural unmasking; however, the effect of encoding temporal fine structure information in electrical pulse timing (PT) is not fully understood. In this study, diotic and dichotic signal detection thresholds were measured in CI listeners using bilaterally synchronized single-electrode stimulation for conditions in which the temporal envelope was presented without temporal fine structure encoded (constant-rate pulses) or with temporal fine structure encoded (pulses timed to peaks of the temporal fine structure). CI listeners showed greater binaural unmasking at 125 pps with temporal fine structure encoded than without. There was no significant effect of encoding temporal fine structure at 250 pps. A similar pattern of performance was shown by NH listeners presented with acoustic pulse trains designed to simulate CI stimulation. The results suggest a trade-off across low rates between interaural information obtained from temporal envelope and that obtained from temporal fine structure encoded in PT.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31153315      PMCID: PMC6525004          DOI: 10.1121/1.5102158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  The normalized interaural correlation: accounting for NoS pi thresholds obtained with Gaussian and "low-noise" masking noise.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; S van de Par; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A binaural analog of gap detection.

Authors:  M A Akeroyd; A Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Frequency modulation detection in cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  Hongbin Chen; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Limitations on rate discrimination.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Binaural unmasking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Robert P Carlyon; Ruth Y Litovsky; Daniel H Downs
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-08-29
View more
  1 in total

1.  Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Damir Kovačić; Chris J James
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.