Literature DB >> 12243150

Limitations on rate discrimination.

Robert P Carlyon1, John M Deeks.   

Abstract

We investigated the limits of temporal pitch processing under conditions where the place and rate of stimulation on the basilar membrane were independent. Stimuli were harmonic complexes passed through a fixed bandpass filter and resembled filtered pulse trains. The task was to detect a difference in F0. When the harmonics were filtered between 3900-5400 Hz, presented monaurally, and summed in sine phase, subjects could perform the task at all FOs studied. However, when the pulse rate was doubled by summing components in alternating phase, thresholds increased with increasing F0 until the task was impossible at F0 = 300 Hz (pulse rate=600 pps). Thresholds improved again at higher FOs, presumably because some harmonics became resolved. The F0 at which this breakdown occurred decreased when the complexes were filtered into a lower frequency region, and increased when they were filtered into a higher region. In the highest region tested (7800-10800 Hz), all listeners could detect an increase of less than about 20% re: a pulse rate of 600 pps for alternating-phase complexes. Presenting a copy of the standard (lower-F0) stimulus to the contralateral ear during all intervals of a forced-choice trial improved performance markedly under conditions where monaural rate discrimination was very poor. This showed that temporal information is present in the auditory nerve that is unavailable to the temporal pitch mechanism, but which is accessible when a binaural cue is available. The results are compared to the inability of most cochlear implantees to detect increases in the rate of electrical pulse trains above about 300 pps. It is concluded that this inability is unlikely to result entirely from a central pitch limitation, because, with analogous acoustic stimulation, normal listeners can perform the task at substantially higher rates.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12243150     DOI: 10.1121/1.1496766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Multichannel place pitch sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-27

2.  Temporal weighting of binaural cues revealed by detection of dynamic interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Andrew D Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

4.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of Aging on Perceptual and Electrophysiological Responses to Acoustic Pulse Trains as a Function of Rate.

Authors:  Casey Gaskins; Brittany N Jaekel; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants?

Authors:  Pieter J Venter; Johan J Hanekom
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-19

9.  Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Implications for within- and across-ear envelope comparison.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Pitch perception: dissociating frequency from fundamental-frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.