Literature DB >> 23556595

Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.

Matthew J Goupell1, Corey Stoelb, Alan Kan, Ruth Y Litovsky.   

Abstract

Although bilateral cochlear implantation has the potential to improve sound localization and speech understanding in noise, obstacles exist in presenting maximally useful binaural information to bilateral cochlear-implant (CI) users. One obstacle is that electrode arrays may differ in cochlear position by several millimeters, thereby stimulating different neural populations. Effects of interaural frequency mismatch on binaural processing were studied in normal-hearing (NH) listeners using band-limited pulse trains, thereby avoiding confounding factors that may occur in CI users. In experiment 1, binaural image fusion was measured to capture perceptual number, location, and compactness. Subjects heard a single, compact image on 73% of the trials. In experiment 2, intracranial image location was measured for different interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs). For larger mismatch, locations perceptually shifted towards the ear with the higher carrier frequency. In experiment 3, ITD and ILD just-noticeable differences (JNDs) were measured. JNDs increased with decreasing bandwidth and increasing mismatch, but were always measurable up to 3 mm of mismatch. If binaural-hearing mechanisms are similar between NH and CI subjects, these results may explain reduced sensitivity of ITDs and ILDs in CI users. Large mismatches may lead to distorted spatial maps and reduced binaural image fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23556595      PMCID: PMC3631247          DOI: 10.1121/1.4792936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  Quantifying the distortion products generated by amplitude-modulated noise.

Authors:  L Wiegrebe; R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Donald K Eddington; H Steven Colburn; William M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interaural spectral asymmetry and sensitivity to interaural time differences.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lateralization produced by interaural temporal and intensitive disparities of high-frequency, raised-sine stimuli: data and modeling.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interaural level differences and the level-meter model.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Zachary A Constan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The influence of different segments of the ongoing envelope on sensitivity to interaural time delays.

Authors:  Martin Klein-Hennig; Mathias Dietz; Volker Hohmann; Stephan D Ewert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Two-dimensional localization of virtual sound sources in cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Two-image lateralization of tones and clicks.

Authors:  E R Hafter; L A Jeffress
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Apparent auditory source width insensitivity in older hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Bernhard U Seeber; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  57 in total

1.  Evidence for a neural source of the precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Tanvi Thakkar; G Christopher Stecker; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

4.  Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Erica Ehlers; Matthew J Goupell; Yi Zheng; Shelly P Godar; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Low-frequency signals support perceptual organization of implant-simulated speech for adults and children.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Eric Tarr; Virginia Bolster; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Binaural hearing in children using Gaussian enveloped and transposed tones.

Authors:  Erica Ehlers; Alan Kan; Matthew B Winn; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Daniel H Lee; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.