Literature DB >> 20130202

Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity.

John C Middlebrooks1, Russell L Snyder.   

Abstract

Deaf people who use cochlear implants show surprisingly poor sensitivity to the temporal fine structure of sounds. One possible reason is that conventional cochlear implants cannot activate selectively the auditory-nerve fibers having low characteristic frequencies (CFs), which, in normal hearing, phase lock to stimulus fine structure. Recently, we tested in animals an alternative mode of auditory prosthesis using penetrating auditory-nerve electrodes that permit frequency-specific excitation in all frequency regions. We present here measures of temporal transmission through the auditory brainstem, from pulse trains presented with various auditory-nerve electrodes to phase-locked activity of neurons in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). On average, intraneural stimulation resulted in significant ICC phase locking at higher pulse rates (i.e., higher "limiting rates") than did cochlear-implant stimulation. That could be attributed, however, to the larger percentage of low-CF neurons activated selectively by intraneural stimulation. Most ICC neurons with limiting rates >500 pulses per second had CFs <1.5 kHz, whereas neurons with lower limiting rates tended to have higher CFs. High limiting rates also correlated strongly with short first-spike latencies. It follows that short latencies correlated significantly with low CFs, opposite to the correlation observed with acoustical stimulation. These electrical-stimulation results reveal a high-temporal-acuity brainstem pathway characterized by low CFs, short latencies, and high-fidelity transmission of periodic stimulation. Frequency-specific stimulation of that pathway by intraneural stimulation might improve temporal acuity in human users of a future auditory prosthesis, which in turn might improve musical pitch perception and speech reception in noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20130202      PMCID: PMC2828779          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4949-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

Review 1.  Parallel auditory pathways: projection patterns of the different neuronal populations in the dorsal and ventral cochlear nuclei.

Authors:  Nell B Cant; Christina G Benson
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Topography of interaural temporal disparity coding in projections of medial superior olive to inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Douglas L Oliver; Gretchen E Beckius; Deborah C Bishop; William C Loftus; Ranjan Batra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli.

Authors:  C van den Honert; P H Stypulkowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  High-synchrony cochlear compound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tone bursts.

Authors:  S E Shore; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization.

Authors:  J M Goldberg; P B Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Cytoarchitecture of the cochlear nuclei in the cat.

Authors:  K K Osen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Y C Tong; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  54 in total

1.  Time course of dynamic range adaptation in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Bo Wen; Grace I Wang; Isabel Dean; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Selective recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation using a penetrating electrode array in the feline model.

Authors:  Yarah M Haidar; Ronald Sahyouni; Omid Moshtaghi; Beverly Y Wang; Hamid R Djalilian; John C Middlebrooks; Sunil P Verma; Harrison W Lin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Cherish Oberzut
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech.

Authors:  Christian Stilp; Gail Donaldson; Soohee Oh; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Stream segregation with high spatial acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Zekiye A Onsan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of temporal stimulus properties on the perception of across-frequency asynchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.