Literature DB >> 20329848

Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Thomas Lu1, Ruth Litovsky, Fan-Gang Zeng.   

Abstract

At present commercially available bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) improve their users' speech understanding in noise but they employ two independent speech processors that cannot provide accurate and appropriate interaural level and time differences as seen binaurally in normal hearing (NH) listeners. Previous work suggests that binaural cues are accessible to bilateral CI users when presented to single pairs of pitch-matched electrodes, but the scope was limited and the mechanisms remained unclear. In this study, binaural masking level differences (BMLDs) were measured in five bilateral Nucleus-24 CI users over multiple pairs of pitch-matched electrodes. Average BMLD was 4.6+/-4.9 dB, but large individual variability prevented significance (p=0.09). Considering just the 125 Hz condition, as in previous work, phase (N0S0 vs N0Spi) and electrode effects were significant. Compared with simulated bilateral CI users, actual bilateral CI users had proportionally higher thresholds for N0Spi than N0S0. Together the present results suggest that the performance gap in BMLDs between CI and NH listeners is not due to a lack of sufficient acoustic cues in the temporal envelope domain but to a true binaural deficit related to a central mechanism in deprived binaural processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20329848      PMCID: PMC2856512          DOI: 10.1121/1.3290994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Developmental changes in the precedence effect: estimates of minimum audible angle.

Authors:  R Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Discrimination of interaural differences of time in the envelopes of high-frequency signals: integration times.

Authors:  T N Buell; E R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Short-term and long-term effects on the masking level difference following middle ear surgery.

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Cochlear implantation: relationships with research on auditory deprivation and acclimatization.

Authors:  R S Tyler; A Q Summerfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; Y C Tong; R D Hollow; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  18 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

3.  Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Binaural unmasking of multi-channel stimuli in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lieselot Van Deun; Astrid van Wieringen; Tom Francart; Andreas Büchner; Thomas Lenarz; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-09

5.  Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Central masking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Payton Lin; Thomas Lu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Binaural release from masking with single- and multi-electrode stimulation in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Sarah L Hodgson; Mary Ellen Scherer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.