Literature DB >> 12433401

Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

Fan Gang Zeng1.   

Abstract

Both place and temporal codes in the peripheral auditory system contain pitch information, however, their actual use by the brain is unclear. Here pitch data are reported from users of the cochlear implant, which provides the ability to change the temporal code independently from the place code. With fixed electrode stimulation, both frequency discrimination and pitch estimate data show that the cochlear implant users can only discern differences in pitch for frequencies up to about 300 Hz. An integration model can predict pitch estimation from frequency discrimination, reinforcing Fechner's hypothesis relating sensation magnitude to stimulus discriminability. The present results suggest that 300 Hz is the upper boundary of the temporal code and that the absolute place information should be included in the present pitch models. They further suggest that future cochlear implants need to increase the number of independent electrodes to restore normal pitch range and resolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12433401     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00644-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  103 in total

1.  Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Encoding pitch contours using current steering.

Authors:  Xin Luo; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

5.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

6.  Correlations Between Pitch and Phoneme Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Their Normal Hearing Peers.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 7.  Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  N T Jiam; M Caldwell; M L Deroche; M Chatterjee; C J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Representations of Time-Varying Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Optogenetic stimulation of the cochlear nucleus using channelrhodopsin-2 evokes activity in the central auditory pathways.

Authors:  Keith N Darrow; Michaël C C Slama; Elliott D Kozin; Maryanna Owoc; Kenneth Hancock; Judith Kempfle; Albert Edge; Stephanie Lacour; Edward Boyden; Daniel Polley; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.