Literature DB >> 18385162

Brief assessment of parents' attitudes toward testing minor children for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes: development and validation of the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS).

Beth N Peshkin1, Tiffani A DeMarco, Judy E Garber, Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir, Andrea F Patenaude, Katherine A Schneider, Marc D Schwartz, Kenneth P Tercyak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk (BRCA1/2 testing) is not recommended for minor children due to its lack of immediate medical benefit and potential psychological risk. Yet, tested mothers are often interested in learning about their children's cancer risks via pediatric BRCA1/2 testing, raising a host of bioethical concerns. However, no reliable or valid tool exists to formally gauge parents' interest in such testing. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new measure for use in genetic research and consultation, known as the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS).
METHODS: After pretest genetic counseling and provision of a blood sample for BRCA1/2 testing, the P-TAS was administered to 187 mothers of children between 8- and 21-years-old. The measure was also given to 96 of the mothers' nontested co-parents. Analyses of the factor structure and psychometric properties of the measure were performed in mothers and confirmed in their co-parents.
RESULTS: The two factors of the P-TAS, labeled Attitudes and Beliefs (Factor 1) and Decision Making and Communication (Factor 2), accounted for 62.9% of the variance and were reliable (Cronbach's coefficient alphas =.70 and .90, respectively); the structure and properties were largely confirmed among co-parents. Validity was indicated through its convergence with related constructs.
CONCLUSIONS: This new tool may be integrated into genetic counseling research to better assess parents' attitudes and interests in pediatric BRCA1/2 testing. Such information may help guide ongoing discussions about the appropriateness of testing in adolescent or young adult children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18385162      PMCID: PMC2699245          DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol        ISSN: 0146-8693


  46 in total

1.  Testing adolescents for a hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1): respecting their autonomy is in their best interest.

Authors:  B S Elger; T W Harding
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2000-02

2.  Introduction to special issue: Evidence-based assessment in pediatric psychology.

Authors:  Lindsey L Cohen; Annette M La Greca; Ronald L Blount; Anne E Kazak; Grayson N Holmbeck; Kathleen L Lemanek
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2006-05-04

Review 3.  Structural equation modeling in pediatric psychology: overview and review of applications.

Authors:  Timothy D Nelson; Brandon S Aylward; Ric G Steele
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2007-10-31

4.  Should genetic testing for BRCA1/2 be permitted for minors? Opinions of BRCA mutation carriers and their adult offspring.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Kimberly Pawlowski; Comfort N Ibe; Shelly A Cummings; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 5.  Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers.

Authors:  P Borry; L Stultiens; H Nys; J-J Cassiman; K Dierickx
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Attitudes toward the genetic testing of children among adults in a Utah-based kindred tested for a BRCA1 mutation.

Authors:  H A Hamann; R T Croyle; V L Venne; B J Baty; K R Smith; J R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-05-01

7.  Attitudes regarding predictive genetic testing in minors: a survey of European clinical geneticists.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Tom Goffin; Herman Nys; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Role of parenting relationship quality in communicating about maternal BRCA1/2 genetic test results with children.

Authors:  Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Satisfaction with genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among African American women.

Authors:  Sarah Charles; Lisa Kessler; Jill E Stopfer; Susan Domchek; Chanita Hughes Halbert
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-03-14

10.  Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.

Authors:  Sining Chen; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  16 in total

1.  Introduction to the special issue: psychological aspects of genomics and child health.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-12-06

2.  Commentary: Children and predictive genomic testing: disease prevention, research protection, and our future.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Kenneth P Tercyak; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2011-08-04

3.  Parents' attitudes toward pediatric genetic testing for common disease risk.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Sharon Hensley Alford; Karen M Emmons; Isaac M Lipkus; Benjamin S Wilfond; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Effects of undergoing multiplex genetic susceptibility testing on parent attitudes towards testing their children.

Authors:  Anne C Madeo; Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth A Tarini; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-06

6.  Distress and the parenting dynamic among BRCA1/2 tested mothers and their partners.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Tiffani A DeMarco; George Luta; Beth N Peshkin; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Unintended diagnosis of Von Hippel Lindau syndrome using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH): counseling challenges arising from unexpected information.

Authors:  Jennifer Hogan; A Turner; K Tucker; L Warwick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  On the development of a decision support intervention for mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 cancer genetic testing regarding communicating test results to their children.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A Demarco; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Beth A Tarini; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

10.  Primary care providers' willingness to recommend BRCA1/2 testing to adolescents.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Beth N Peshkin; George Luta; Anisha Abraham; Leslie R Walker; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.