Literature DB >> 18200522

Attitudes regarding predictive genetic testing in minors: a survey of European clinical geneticists.

Pascal Borry1, Tom Goffin, Herman Nys, Kris Dierickx.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to gather information from European clinical geneticists about their practices and attitudes with regard to presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors. European clinical institutes where genetic counseling is offered to patients were contacted. One hundred seventy-seven of the 287 eligible respondents (63%) answered a questionnaire. There was strongest support for testing young children when it provides a clear medical benefit, such as in the case of FAP and MEN2A. However, there is disagreement about when to provide predictive genetic testing for childhood-onset disorders for which therapeutic or preventive measures exist with some supporting the rule of earliest onset and others giving parents wider discretion. However, for childhood-onset disorders that do not have therapeutic measures, the majority of the respondents is unwilling to provide a presymptomatic or predictive genetic test. With respect to adolescents, many held a cautious position regarding presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing. Most clinical geneticists were unwilling to provide a presymptomatic or predictive genetic test for adult-onset diseases, except if it might provide a medical benefit. Although adolescents might be legally in the position to request a presymptomatic or predictive genetic test personally, the clinical geneticists are significantly more willing to provide a test if this request is made together with the minor's parents. This variability demonstrates the need for clinical geneticists to discuss their contradicting views and to develop harmonized practices throughout Europe. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18200522     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  15 in total

1.  A qualitative study exploring genetic counsellors' experiences of counselling children.

Authors:  Fiona Ulph; James Leong; Cris Glazebrook; Ellen Townsend
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Testing teens: a commentary.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Cynthia A Prows; Melissa DeJonckheere; William B Brinkman; Lisa Vaughn; Melanie F Myers
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Erisa Mwaka; Lyn Horn
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Brief assessment of parents' attitudes toward testing minor children for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes: development and validation of the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS).

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco; Judy E Garber; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Marc D Schwartz; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-04-01

7.  Primary care providers' willingness to recommend BRCA1/2 testing to adolescents.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Beth N Peshkin; George Luta; Anisha Abraham; Leslie R Walker; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Adolescent medical providers' willingness to recommend genetic susceptibility testing for nicotine addiction and lung cancer risk to adolescents.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; George Luta; Beth N Peshkin; Anisha Abraham; Leslie R Walker; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-08-07

9.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for myotonic dystrophy type 1: upon request to child.

Authors:  Marjan De Rademaeker; Willem Verpoest; Martine De Rycke; Sara Seneca; Karen Sermon; Sonja Desmyttere; Maryse Bonduelle; Josianne Van der Elst; Paul Devroey; Inge Liebaers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Parent-Child Communication and Reproductive Considerations in Families with Genetic Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Taylor M Dattilo; Keagan G Lipak; Olivia E Clark; Alison Gehred; Amani Sampson; Gwendolyn Quinn; Kristin Zajo; Megan E Sutter; Meghan Bowman-Curci; Molly Gardner; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Leena Nahata
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.