Literature DB >> 19390990

Primary care providers' willingness to recommend BRCA1/2 testing to adolescents.

Suzanne C O'Neill1, Beth N Peshkin, George Luta, Anisha Abraham, Leslie R Walker, Kenneth P Tercyak.   

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines discourage pediatric genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations due to a lack of timely medical benefit and psychosocial risk. Yet, some high risk families approach primary care providers (PCPs) about testing adolescents, and little is known about PCPs attitudes regarding these requests. We assessed recommendations for testing to a composite patient (a healthy 13-year-old female, mother is a BRCA mutation carrier) among 161 adolescent and family PCPs attending a national medical conference. Testing recommendations were measured with a multidimensional scale that assessed perspectives on informed consent, genetic counseling, and insurance coverage. PCPs expressed moderate willingness to recommend testing; surprisingly, 31% recommended adolescent testing "unconditionally." In multivariable regression modeling, recommendation was positively associated with higher clinical practice volume (P < .05) and greater frequency of ordering other pediatric genetic tests (P < .01). Despite a decade of clinical practice guideline advice to the contrary, experienced PCPs may still be inclined to recommend BRCA1/2 genetic testing to adolescents from high risk families. When paired with emerging data on the relative safety and efficacy of breast cancer genetic testing for high risk women and the advent of direct-to-consumer marketing of BRCA1/2 cancer genetic tests, professional societies may need to explore best practices to counsel high risk families and their PCPs about the potential risks and benefits of pediatric BRCA1/2 testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19390990      PMCID: PMC3514889          DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9243-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  38 in total

1.  Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications.

Authors:  Caryn Lerman; Robert T Croyle; Kenneth P Tercyak; Heidi Hamann
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

2.  From genetics to genomics: ethics, policy, and parental decision-making.

Authors:  Benjamin Wilfond; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-07-22

3.  Psychological issues among children of hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1/2) testing participants.

Authors:  K P Tercyak; B N Peshkin; R Streisand; C Lerman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Attitudes toward the genetic testing of children among adults in a Utah-based kindred tested for a BRCA1 mutation.

Authors:  H A Hamann; R T Croyle; V L Venne; B J Baty; K R Smith; J R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-05-01

5.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Professional and personal attitudes about access and confidentiality in the genetic testing of children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Campbell; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2003

7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Parent-child factors and their effect on communicating BRCA1/2 test results to children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco; Barbara M Brogan; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-06

9.  Tamoxifen as chemoprevention in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer: a pilot survey of physicians.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Clinton Finch; Sheryl Kent; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Adolescents and genetic testing: what do they think about it?

Authors:  Asaff Harel; Dianne Abuelo; Alessandra Kazura
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.012

View more
  6 in total

1.  Challenges of genetic testing in adolescents with cardiac arrhythmia syndromes.

Authors:  Lilian Liou Cohen; Marina Stolerman; Christine Walsh; David Wasserman; Siobhan M Dolan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Psychosocial Adjustment in School-age Girls With a Family History of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa Schwartz; Brian Egleston; Colleen Burke Sands; Wendy K Chung; Gord Glendon; Jasmine A McDonald; Cynthia Moore; Paula Rauch; Lisa Tuchman; Irene L Andrulis; Saundra S Buys; Caren J Frost; Theresa H M Keegan; Julia A Knight; Mary Beth Terry; Esther M John; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Multilevel Influences on Patient-Oncologist Communication about Genomic Test Results: Oncologist Perspectives.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Kathryn L Taylor; Jonathan Clapp; Jinani Jayasekera; Claudine Isaacs; Deena Mary Atieh Graham; Stuart L Goldberg; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-08-21

4.  Psychosocial Adjustment and Perceived Risk Among Adolescent Girls From Families With BRCA1/2 or Breast Cancer History.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa A Schwartz; Brian L Egleston; Dare Henry-Moss; Susan M Domchek; Mary B Daly; Lisa Tuchman; Cynthia Moore; Paula K Rauch; Rebecca Shorter; Kelsey Karpink; Colleen Burke Sands
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  "Would you test your children without their consent?" and other sticky dilemmas in the field of cancer genetic testing.

Authors:  Karina L Brierley; Danielle C Bonadies; Anne Moyer; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Beth A Tarini; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.