Literature DB >> 21502235

Parents' attitudes toward pediatric genetic testing for common disease risk.

Kenneth P Tercyak1, Sharon Hensley Alford, Karen M Emmons, Isaac M Lipkus, Benjamin S Wilfond, Colleen M McBride.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe parents' attitudes toward pediatric genetic testing for common, adult-onset health conditions and to identify factors underlying these attitudes. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Parents (n = 219) enrolled in a large, group-practice health plan were offered a "multiplex" genetic test for susceptibility to 8 common, adult-onset health conditions and completed an online survey assessing attitudes and beliefs about the risks and benefits of the test for their child, their willingness to consider having their child tested, and other psychosocial variables.
RESULTS: Parents viewed the benefits of pediatric testing to outweigh its risks (positive decisional balance) and were moderately interested in pediatric testing. Variables associated with positive decisional balance included greater interest in knowing about gene-health associations in their child, anticipation of less difficulty understanding their child's genetic health risks, and more positive emotional reactions to learning about their child's decreased health risks (adjusted R(2) = 0.33, P < .0001). Similarly, variables associated with greater parental willingness to test were being a mother (versus being a father), greater perceived risk of diseases in their child, greater interest in knowing about gene-health relationships in their child, anticipating less difficulty learning about their child's genetic health risks, anticipating more positive emotional reactions to learning about their child's decreased health risks, and positive decisional balance (adjusted R(2) = 0.57, P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: As genetic susceptibility testing for common, adult-onset health conditions proliferates, pediatricians should anticipate parents' interest in testing children and be prepared to facilitate informed decision making about such testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21502235      PMCID: PMC3081191          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-0938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  34 in total

1.  Anticipated versus actual emotional reactions to disclosure of results of genetic tests for cancer susceptibility: findings from p53 and BRCA1 testing programs.

Authors:  M Dorval; A F Patenaude; K A Schneider; S A Kieffer; L DiGianni; K J Kalkbrenner; J I Bromberg; L A Basili; K Calzone; J Stopfer; B L Weber; J E Garber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications.

Authors:  Caryn Lerman; Robert T Croyle; Kenneth P Tercyak; Heidi Hamann
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

Review 3.  From pharmacogenetics to personalized medicine: a vital need for educating health professionals and the community.

Authors:  Felix W Frueh; David Gurwitz
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 4.  A life course approach to diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases.

Authors:  I Darnton-Hill; C Nishida; W P T James
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.

Authors:  Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 6.  Multiplex genetic testing. The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies.

Authors:  G Maldonado; S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status.

Authors:  W F Velicer; C C DiClemente; J O Prochaska; N Brandenburg
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1985-05

9.  Parental interrater reliability as a function of situational specificity and familiarity of target child.

Authors:  K R Burrows; C K Kelley
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1983-03

10.  Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.

Authors:  Edward L Schor
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Commentary: Children and predictive genomic testing: disease prevention, research protection, and our future.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Kenneth P Tercyak; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2011-08-04

Review 3.  Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Burcu F Darst; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Genetic knowledge and attitudes of parents of children with congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Sara M Fitzgerald-Butt; Jennifer Klima; Kelly Kelleher; Deena Chisolm; Kim L McBride
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  Effects of undergoing multiplex genetic susceptibility testing on parent attitudes towards testing their children.

Authors:  Anne C Madeo; Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth A Tarini; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-06

7.  Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel S Dodson; Aaron J Goldenberg; Matthew M Davis; Dianne C Singer; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Parental Perception of Self-Empowerment in Pediatric Pharmacogenetic Testing: The Reactions of Parents to the Communication of Actual and Hypothetical CYP2D6 Test Results.

Authors:  Sarah Adelsperger; Cynthia A Prows; Melanie F Myers; Cassandra L Perry; Ariel Chandler; Ingrid A Holm; John A Lynch
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-08-30

9.  Genotype prediction of adult type 2 diabetes from adolescence in a multiracial population.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Pronabesh Dasmahapatra; James B Meigs; Nicholas J Schork; Costan G Magnussen; Wei Chen; Olli T Raitakari; Michael J Pencina; Seema M Jamal; Gerald S Berenson; Elizabeth Goodman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Beth A Tarini; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.