Literature DB >> 18200524

Should genetic testing for BRCA1/2 be permitted for minors? Opinions of BRCA mutation carriers and their adult offspring.

Angela R Bradbury1, Linda Patrick-Miller, Kimberly Pawlowski, Comfort N Ibe, Shelly A Cummings, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Christopher K Daugherty.   

Abstract

Although professional guidelines recommend against testing minors for adult-onset genetic conditions, the genetic testing of minors for BRCA1/2 alterations has been debated in the literature. To better understand the opinions of BRCA mutation carriers regarding the genetic testing of minors and the cognitive and affective processes underlying these opinions, we interviewed BRCA mutation carriers and their adult offspring who had learned of their parent's BRCA mutation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 53 parents and 22 offspring. In response to a closed-ended question, 52% (n = 39) of participants were opposed to the testing of minors. Responses to an open-ended question indicate that many participants (24%, n = 18) feel that testing could be permitted for some minor offspring. Psychological risks and the insufficient maturity of minors were frequent concerns of participants opposed to testing minors. The potential to impact health behaviors was frequently cited as a reason to support the genetic testing of minors. These preliminary results suggest that many BRCA mutation carriers and their adult offspring have concerns about, or are opposed to the genetic testing of minors. However, a significant minority in our study would support testing minors. Greater support for testing among offspring could indicate increasing requests for early genetic diagnosis. Further research is necessary to explore the risks and benefits of providing genetic testing to minors for adult-onset hereditary cancer syndromes in order to inform clinical practice and public policy and to ensure optimal psychosocial and medical outcomes for all members in families at risk for genetically determined disease. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18200524     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  11 in total

1.  Challenges of genetic testing in adolescents with cardiac arrhythmia syndromes.

Authors:  Lilian Liou Cohen; Marina Stolerman; Christine Walsh; David Wasserman; Siobhan M Dolan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  A R Bradbury; L Patrick-Miller; D Fetzer; B Egleston; S A Cummings; A Forman; L Bealin; C Peterson; M Corbman; J O'Connell; M B Daly
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 3.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Should Genetic Testing be Offered for Children? The Perspectives of Adolescents and Emerging Adults in Families with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.

Authors:  Melissa A Alderfer; Robert B Lindell; Claire I Viadro; Kristin Zelley; Jessica Valdez; Belinda Mandrell; Carol A Ford; Kim E Nichols
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Brief assessment of parents' attitudes toward testing minor children for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes: development and validation of the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS).

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco; Judy E Garber; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Marc D Schwartz; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-04-01

6.  On the development of a decision support intervention for mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 cancer genetic testing regarding communicating test results to their children.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A Demarco; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Primary care providers' willingness to recommend BRCA1/2 testing to adolescents.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Beth N Peshkin; George Luta; Anisha Abraham; Leslie R Walker; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Preventive care and evaluation of the adolescent with a breast mass.

Authors:  Yasmin Jayasinghe
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.314

9.  Parent-Child Communication and Reproductive Considerations in Families with Genetic Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Taylor M Dattilo; Keagan G Lipak; Olivia E Clark; Alison Gehred; Amani Sampson; Gwendolyn Quinn; Kristin Zajo; Megan E Sutter; Meghan Bowman-Curci; Molly Gardner; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Leena Nahata
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  From genetic counseling to "genomic counseling".

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.