Literature DB >> 10797419

Attitudes toward the genetic testing of children among adults in a Utah-based kindred tested for a BRCA1 mutation.

H A Hamann1, R T Croyle, V L Venne, B J Baty, K R Smith, J R Botkin.   

Abstract

Advances in molecular biology and genetics have led to the identification of the breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, along with tests to detect mutations in these genes. Although the appropriateness of BRCA1/2 genetic testing for children has been debated in the literature, little is known about the attitudes of individuals who have undergone cancer susceptibility testing. The present study focused on attitudes toward BRCA1 testing for children among 218 adults from a Utah-based kindred who had received BRCA1 test results. Results indicated that approximately one-fourth of the participants would permit BRCA1 testing for children under the age of 18. General attitudes about genetic testing were predictive of attitudes toward the testing of children. In addition, men and individuals without a BRCA1 mutation were more likely to agree that minors should be allowed BRCA1 testing. Individuals whose mother had been affected with breast cancer were less likely to permit testing for minors. Among parents of minor children, less than one-fifth indicated that they would want BRCA1 testing for their own children; carrier status was not predictive of attitudes toward testing their own children. As breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility testing continues to be disseminated into clinical settings, there may be an increase in the number of test requests for minors. The findings of the present study represent an important step in exploring attitudes about genetic testing of children among individuals who have received cancer susceptibility test results. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10797419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  9 in total

1.  A qualitative study exploring genetic counsellors' experiences of counselling children.

Authors:  Fiona Ulph; James Leong; Cris Glazebrook; Ellen Townsend
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The Colored, Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM): A Conceptual Approach and Tool for Genetic Counseling Research.

Authors:  R Kenen; J Peters
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Should Genetic Testing be Offered for Children? The Perspectives of Adolescents and Emerging Adults in Families with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.

Authors:  Melissa A Alderfer; Robert B Lindell; Claire I Viadro; Kristin Zelley; Jessica Valdez; Belinda Mandrell; Carol A Ford; Kim E Nichols
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Brief assessment of parents' attitudes toward testing minor children for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes: development and validation of the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS).

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco; Judy E Garber; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Marc D Schwartz; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-04-01

7.  Primary care providers' willingness to recommend BRCA1/2 testing to adolescents.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Beth N Peshkin; George Luta; Anisha Abraham; Leslie R Walker; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Professional ambivalence: accounts of ethical practice in childhood genetic testing.

Authors:  Michael Arribas-Ayllon; Srikant Sarangi; Angus Clarke
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  "Family matters": a conceptual framework for genetic testing in children.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A Spiridigliozzi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.537

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.