Literature DB >> 10665596

Testing adolescents for a hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1): respecting their autonomy is in their best interest.

B S Elger1, T W Harding.   

Abstract

The testing of individuals before the age of 18 years for hereditary late-onset diseases has been judged ethically not acceptable in guidelines and directives published by medical professional organizations. However, there are not enough best interest arguments to deny genetic testing to an adolescent at risk of carrying a BRCA1 mutation, even if the competence of adolescents for medical decisions is considered to be lower than the competence of adults. The adolescent's decision is not irrational or of very high risk. Respecting adolescents' autonomous choices concerning genetic testing has positive consequences for their self-esteem and psychological health. Geneticists and other professionals should clearly differentiate between children and adolescents in regard to BRCA1 gene testing and recommend giving decision autonomy about the test to all psychologically "normal" adolescents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10665596     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.154.2.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  8 in total

Review 1.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 2.  Controversies in communication of genetic screening results for cancer: a report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology's Screening Special Interest Group (ASPO's 33rd Annual Meeting, March 8 to 10, 2009, Tampa, Florida).

Authors:  Linda Patrick-Miller; Angela R Bradbury; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  When parents disclose BRCA1/2 test results: their communication and perceptions of offspring response.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Mary B Daly; Cynthia W Moore; Colleen B Sands; Helen Schmidheiser; Preethi K Kondamudi; Maia Feigon; Comfort N Ibe; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  "Both Sides of the Wheelchair": The Views of Individuals with, and Parents of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Regarding Pre-symptomatic Testing of Minors.

Authors:  Georgia C Lowe; Louise A Corben; Rony E Duncan; Grace Yoon; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Brief assessment of parents' attitudes toward testing minor children for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes: development and validation of the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS).

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco; Judy E Garber; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Marc D Schwartz; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-04-01

6.  Preventive care and evaluation of the adolescent with a breast mass.

Authors:  Yasmin Jayasinghe
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  "Family matters": a conceptual framework for genetic testing in children.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A Spiridigliozzi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Information needs of mothers regarding communicating BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results to their children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A Demarco; Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2007
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.