Literature DB >> 21816897

Commentary: Children and predictive genomic testing: disease prevention, research protection, and our future.

Beth A Tarini1, Kenneth P Tercyak, Benjamin S Wilfond.   

Abstract

Genetic testing offered by direct-to-consumer companies-herein referred to as "predictive genomic testing"--has come under federal scrutiny. Critics claim testing yields uninterpretable and potentially harmful information. Supporters assert individuals have a right to this information, which could catalyze preventive health actions. Despite contentions that predictive genomic testing is a tool of primary disease prevention, little discussion has focused on its use with children. This partly stems from concerns expressed in existing professional guidelines about the potential for psychological and behavioral harm to children engendered by predictive genetic tests for Mendelian diseases. Conducting research to understand the actual benefits and harms is important for policy development and practice guidance and can be ethically justified within the pediatric regulatory framework of research that offers a prospect of direct benefit. Child health psychologists are well poised to contribute to this research effort, and promote the translation of genomic discoveries to improve pediatric medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21816897      PMCID: PMC3199444          DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsr040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol        ISSN: 0146-8693


  49 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Implications of genetic epidemiology for the prevention of tobacco use.

Authors:  G E Swan
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 3.  Population screening in the age of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Linda L McCabe; Edward R B McCabe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The path to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Margaret A Hamburg; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Direct to consumer genetic tests.

Authors:  Christine Patch; Jorge Sequeiros; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  An agenda for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Pauline C Ng; Sarah S Murray; Samuel Levy; J Craig Venter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The genetic testing of children. Working Party of the Clinical Genetics Society (UK)

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium.

Authors:  L A Farrer; L A Cupples; J L Haines; B Hyman; W A Kukull; R Mayeux; R H Myers; M A Pericak-Vance; N Risch; C M van Duijn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Oct 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

1.  Reducing aggression and impulsivity through school-based prevention programs: a gene by intervention interaction.

Authors:  Rashelle J Musci; Catherine P Bradshaw; Brion Maher; George R Uhl; Sheppard G Kellam; Nicholas S Ialongo
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2014-12

2.  Ethical issues in presymptomatic genetic testing for minors: a dilemma in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  Brice Fresneau; Laurence Brugières; Olivier Caron; Grégoire Moutel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Pediatric Predispositional Genetic Risk Communication: Potential Utility for Prevention and Control of Melanoma Risk as an Exemplar.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Darren Mays; Wendy Kohlmann; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Ethical issues in neonatal and pediatric clinical trials.

Authors:  Naomi Laventhal; Beth A Tarini; John Lantos
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 3.278

Review 5.  Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Beth A Tarini; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

6.  Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Testing Attitudes Scale-Diabetes (P-TAS-D) for parents of children undergoing predictive risk screening.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Darren Mays; Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Johnny Ludvigsson; Ulrica Swartling
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.866

7.  Bridging the Communication Divide: A Role for Health Psychology in the Genomic Era.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Suzanne C O'Neill; Debra L Roter; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Prof Psychol Res Pr       Date:  2012-12

8.  Engaging children in genomics research: decoding the meaning of assent in research.

Authors:  Benjamin S Wilfond; Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.