Literature DB >> 17764708

Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Alexander A Bachmanov1, Gary K Beauchamp.   

Abstract

Compared with mice from the 129P3/J (129) inbred strain, mice from the C57BL/6ByJ (B6) inbred strain have higher consumption of several sweet-tasting amino acids and carbohydrates. To examine the relative contribution of taste and nutritive properties in these strain differences, we measured responses of B6 and 129 mice to eight sweet and non-sweet amino acids and carbohydrates in two-bottle preference tests with water. Mice from the two strains did not differ in consumption of non-sweet l-valine and l-histidine. Compared with 129 mice, B6 mice had higher consumption and lower preference thresholds for sweet amino acids l-glutamine, l-alanine and l-threonine, monosaccharides glucose and fructose, and maltooligosaccharide. These data suggest that differences in gustatory responsiveness are an important factor underlying higher consumption of some amino acids and carbohydrates by B6 mice compared with 129 mice. It is likely that in B6 mice, higher sweet taste responsiveness results in increased consumption of sweet-tasting amino acids and sugars, and higher taste responsiveness to complex carbohydrates results in increased consumption of maltooligosaccharide. However, postingestive processes also influence nutrient consumption and may be responsible for higher intake of carbohydrates compared with sweet-tasting amino acids. Results of this study set the stage for genetic analysis of differences between B6 and 129 mice in taste responsiveness and macronutrient consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17764708      PMCID: PMC2235816          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  43 in total

1.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

2.  Measuring gustatory variation in mice: a short-term fluid-intake test.

Authors:  B S Kotlus; D A Blizard
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1998-04

3.  The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception.

Authors:  Bernd Bufe; Paul A S Breslin; Christina Kuhn; Danielle R Reed; Christopher D Tharp; Jay P Slack; Un-Kyung Kim; Dennis Drayna; Wolfgang Meyerhof
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Inbred mouse strain survey of sucrose intake.

Authors:  Sarah R Lewis; Sabrina Ahmed; Cheryl Dym; Eleonora Khaimova; Benjamin Kest; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-08-07

5.  Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Amino acids as taste stimuli. II. Quality coding.

Authors:  T C Pritchard; T R Scott
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-12-16       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Amino acids as taste stimuli. I. Neural and behavioral attributes.

Authors:  T C Pritchard; T R Scott
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-12-16       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Gustatory neural responses in three different strains of mice.

Authors:  Y Ninomiya; T Mizukoshi; T Higashi; H Katsukawa; M Funakoshi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-06-08       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-03-09

10.  Ethanol consumption and taste preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129/J mice.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; M G Tordoff; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  16 in total

1.  Nutrient selection in the absence of taste receptor signaling.

Authors:  Xueying Ren; Jozélia G Ferreira; Ligang Zhou; Sara J Shammah-Lagnado; Catherine W Yeckel; Ivan E de Araujo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 4.  The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-03-02

5.  Impact of T1r3 and Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Taste sensitivity to a mixture of monosodium glutamate and inosine 5'-monophosphate by mice lacking both subunits of the T1R1+T1R3 amino acid receptor.

Authors:  Ginger D Blonde; Susan P Travers; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Enantiomer-specific selection of amino acids.

Authors:  Xueying Ren; Luis A Tellez; Ivan E de Araujo
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.520

8.  Regulation of bitter taste responses by tumor necrosis factor.

Authors:  Pu Feng; Masafumi Jyotaki; Agnes Kim; Jinghua Chai; Nirvine Simon; Minliang Zhou; Alexander A Bachmanov; Liquan Huang; Hong Wang
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 9.  Glutamate taste and appetite in laboratory mice: physiologic and genetic analyses.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Masashi Inoue; Hong Ji; Yuko Murata; Michael G Tordoff; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.