Literature DB >> 17911381

Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Masashi Inoue1, John I Glendinning, Maria L Theodorides, Sarah Harkness, Xia Li, Natalia Bosak, Gary K Beauchamp, Alexander A Bachmanov.   

Abstract

The Tas1r3 gene encodes the T1R3 receptor protein, which is involved in sweet taste transduction. To characterize ligand specificity of the T1R3 receptor and the genetic architecture of sweet taste responsiveness, we analyzed taste responses of 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice to a variety of chemically diverse sweeteners and glucose polymers with three different measures: consumption in 48-h two-bottle preference tests, initial licking responses, and responses of the chorda tympani nerve. The results were generally consistent across the three measures. Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 gene influenced taste responsiveness to nonnutritive sweeteners (saccharin, acesulfame-K, sucralose, SC-45647), sugars (sucrose, maltose, glucose, fructose), sugar alcohols (erythritol, sorbitol), and some amino acids (D-tryptophan, D-phenylalanine, L-proline). Tas1r3 genotype did not affect taste responses to several sweet-tasting amino acids (L-glutamine, L-threonine, L-alanine, glycine), glucose polymers (Polycose, maltooligosaccharide), and nonsweet NaCl, HCl, quinine, monosodium glutamate, and inosine 5'-monophosphate. Thus Tas1r3 polymorphisms affect taste responses to many nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners (all of which must interact with a taste receptor involving T1R3), but not to all carbohydrates and amino acids. In addition, we found that the genetic architecture of sweet taste responsiveness changes depending on the measure of taste response and the intensity of the sweet taste stimulus. Variation in the T1R3 receptor influenced peripheral taste responsiveness over a wide range of sweetener concentrations, but behavioral responses to higher concentrations of some sweeteners increasingly depended on mechanisms that could override input from the peripheral taste system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17911381      PMCID: PMC2259227          DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00161.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Genomics        ISSN: 1094-8341            Impact factor:   3.107


  66 in total

1.  Lack of an order effect in brief contact taste tests with closely spaced test trials.

Authors:  J C Smith; J D Davis; G B O'Keefe
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1992-12

2.  Peripheral neural basis for behavioural discrimination between glutamate and the four basic taste substances in mice.

Authors:  Y Ninomiya; M Funakoshi
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1989

3.  Differential taste responses of mouse chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves to sugars and amino acids.

Authors:  Y Ninomiya; H Kajiura; K Mochizuki
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1993-12-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Why do sugars taste good?

Authors:  I Ramirez
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  The genetic basis of preference for sweet substances among inbred strains of mice: preference ratio phenotypes and the alleles of the Sac and dpa loci.

Authors:  C G Capeless; G Whitney
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Habituation of oromotor responding to oral infusions in rat pups.

Authors:  S E Swithers-Mulvey; G L Miller; W G Hall
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Localization of genes affecting alcohol drinking in mice.

Authors:  T J Phillips; J C Crabbe; P Metten; J K Belknap
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Response characteristics of three taste nerves in mice.

Authors:  T Shingai; L M Beidler
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-06-03       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  The genetics of tasting in mice. VI. Saccharin, acesulfame, dulcin and sucrose.

Authors:  I E Lush
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Electrophysiological characterization of the inhibitory effect of a novel peptide gurmarin on the sweet taste response in rats.

Authors:  A Miyasaka; T Imoto
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1995-04-03       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  42 in total

1.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  Taste receptor genes.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 3.  Minireview: Nutrient sensing by G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Eric M Wauson; Andrés Lorente-Rodríguez; Melanie H Cobb
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-07-02

Review 4.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 5.  The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-03-02

6.  Cocaine decreases saccharin preference without altering sweet taste sensitivity.

Authors:  Jennifer K Roebber; Sari Izenwasser; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Behavioral evidence for a glucose polymer taste receptor that is independent of the T1R2+3 heterodimer in a mouse model.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Determinants of taste preference and acceptability: quality versus hedonics.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ginger D Blonde; Lisa A Eckel; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

10.  An analysis of licking microstructure in three strains of mice.

Authors:  A W Johnson; A Sherwood; D R Smith; M Wosiski-Kuhn; M Gallagher; P C Holland
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.