Literature DB >> 23547138

Impact of T1r3 and Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice.

Steven Zukerman1, John I Glendinning, Robert F Margolskee, Anthony Sclafani.   

Abstract

Knockout (KO) mice missing the sweet taste receptor subunit T1r3 or the signaling protein Trpm5 have greatly attenuated sweetener preferences but learn to prefer sucrose in 24-h tests. Here, we examined 24-h preferences of T1r3 KO, Trpm5 KO, and C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) mice for glucose, fructose, galactose, and corn starch. Unlike glucose, fructose has little postoral reward effect in WT mice, whereas conflicting data have been obtained with galactose. Naïve KO mice were initially indifferent to dilute glucose solutions (0.5-4%) but exhibited strong preferences for 8-32% concentrations. In a second test, they strongly preferred (~90%) all glucose concentrations although they drank less sugar than WT mice. Naïve KO mice were indifferent to 0.5-8% fructose and avoided 16-32% fructose. However, the glucose-experienced KO mice displayed significant preferences for all fructose solutions. Naïve KO mice preferred only 8% galactose, whereas WT mice preferred 4-16% galactose, and all mice avoided 32% galactose. Galactose experience enhanced the preference for this sugar in KO and WT mice. Naïve T1r3 KO and WT mice displayed similar preferences for 0.5-32% corn starch, which were enhanced by starch experience. Naïve Trpm5 KO mice did not prefer starch but did so after 1-bottle starch experience. The results confirm the sweet taste deficits of T1r3 KO and Trpm5 KO mice but demonstrate their ability to develop strong glucose and milder galactose preferences attributed to the postoral actions of these sugars. The acquired preference for the non-sweet flavor properties of glucose generalized to those of fructose. The findings further demonstrate that although Trpm5 (but not T1r3) signaling is essential for starch preference, Trpm5 KO mice can learn to prefer starch based on its postoral effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  T1r3 KO mice; Trpm5 KO mice; experience; fructose; galactose; glucose; postoral conditioning; starch

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23547138      PMCID: PMC3657733          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjt011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  63 in total

1.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

2.  T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Amylase expression in taste receptor cells of rat circumvallate papillae.

Authors:  Flavia Merigo; Donatella Benati; Maria Paola Cecchini; Mirko Cristofoletti; Francesco Osculati; Andrea Sbarbati
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling.

Authors:  Ivan E de Araujo; Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Raul R Gainetdinov; Marc G Caron; Miguel A L Nicolelis; Sidney A Simon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Fat and carbohydrate preferences in mice: the contribution of alpha-gustducin and Trpm5 taste-signaling proteins.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  T1R2 and T1R3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Multiple sweet receptors and transduction pathways revealed in knockout mice by temperature dependence and gurmarin sensitivity.

Authors:  Tadahiro Ohkuri; Keiko Yasumatsu; Nao Horio; Masafumi Jyotaki; Robert F Margolskee; Yuzo Ninomiya
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Gut-expressed gustducin and taste receptors regulate secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1.

Authors:  Hyeung-Jin Jang; Zaza Kokrashvili; Michael J Theodorakis; Olga D Carlson; Byung-Joon Kim; Jie Zhou; Hyeon Ho Kim; Xiangru Xu; Sic L Chan; Magdalena Juhaszova; Michel Bernier; Bedrich Mosinger; Robert F Margolskee; Josephine M Egan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  T1R3 and gustducin in gut sense sugars to regulate expression of Na+-glucose cotransporter 1.

Authors:  Robert F Margolskee; Jane Dyer; Zaza Kokrashvili; Kieron S H Salmon; Erwin Ilegems; Kristian Daly; Emeline L Maillet; Yuzo Ninomiya; Bedrich Mosinger; Soraya P Shirazi-Beechey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Perception of sweet taste is important for voluntary alcohol consumption in mice.

Authors:  Y A Blednov; D Walker; M Martinez; M Levine; S Damak; R F Margolskee
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  24 in total

1.  CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

3.  Greater reductions in fat preferences in CALHM1 than CD36 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Philippe Marambaud; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-12-31

5.  Nutrient-conditioned intake stimulation does not require a distinctive flavor cue in rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Sugar causes obesity and metabolic syndrome in mice independently of sweet taste.

Authors:  Ana Andres-Hernando; Masanari Kuwabara; David J Orlicky; Aurelie Vandenbeuch; Christina Cicerchi; Sue C Kinnamon; Thomas E Finger; Richard J Johnson; Miguel A Lanaspa
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.310

7.  Role of lipolysis in postoral and oral fat preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-12

9.  Intragastric fat self-administration is impaired in GPR40/120 double knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Khalid Touzani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-04-21

10.  Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.