Literature DB >> 16529783

Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.

Anthony Sclafani1.   

Abstract

Prior research with inbred mouse strains indicates that C57BL/6J (B6) mice display stronger preference and acceptance for various sweeteners than do 129P3/J (129) mice. Experiment 1 examined the extent to which this strain difference could be modified by repeated exposure to sucrose. Sucrose-naive 129 mice displayed weaker preferences than did B6 mice for 0.5% to 4% sucrose solutions during 23h/day sugar vs. water tests. Sucrose preference did not differ at 8-32% concentrations. Yet, when retested with sucrose, the 129 and B6 mice showed identical robust preferences (>90%) for 0.5-32% solutions. The strains also did not differ in sucrose preference in tests with descending sucrose concentrations (0.5-0.0625%). Sucrose-experienced 129 mice also showed enhanced preference for dilute saccharin solutions suggesting that their sweet taste responsivity was enhanced. Experiment 2 revealed that preference for dilute saccharin solutions was enhanced by prior saccharin experience in B6 but not 129 mice. Experiment 3 tested the strains with Polycose which has a palatable taste different from that of sucrose. Polycose-naive 129 mice displayed weaker preferences for dilute (0.5-4%) but not concentrated (8-32%) Polycose solutions relative to B6 mice. In the second test series Polycose preferences were nearly identical in the two strains. In Experiments 1 and 3, prior sucrose or Polycose experience also reduced or eliminated strain differences in saccharide acceptance (absolute intake) at higher but not lower concentrations. Thus, exposure to the oral and post-oral actions of sucrose and Polycose increased saccharide preference in B6 mice and even more in 129 mice so that the strain difference virtually disappeared. Whether the 129 mice responded to the taste or other properties (e.g., odor) of the dilute saccharide solutions is not certain but their gustatory sensitivity needs to be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16529783     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  35 in total

1.  Nutrient selection in the absence of taste receptor signaling.

Authors:  Xueying Ren; Jozélia G Ferreira; Ligang Zhou; Sara J Shammah-Lagnado; Catherine W Yeckel; Ivan E de Araujo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Chris Carballo; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Taste-evoked responses to sweeteners in the nucleus of the solitary tract differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Sweet preference modified by early experience in mice and the related molecular modulations on the peripheral pathway.

Authors:  Wei-Li Li; Meng-Ling Chen; Si-Si Liu; Guo-Liang Li; Tian-Yuan Gu; Pei Liang; Yu-Mei Qin; Yue-Hua Zhan; Ying Quan; Gen-Hua Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.444

6.  Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Alexander Pinhas; Michael Aviel; Michael Koen; Simon Gurgov; Vanessa Acosta; Michael Israel; Leonid Kakuriev; Elena Guskova; Isabelle Fuzailov; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-09-14

7.  Loss of neurotensin receptor-1 disrupts the control of the mesolimbic dopamine system by leptin and promotes hedonic feeding and obesity.

Authors:  Darren Opland; Amy Sutton; Hillary Woodworth; Juliette Brown; Raluca Bugescu; Adriana Garcia; Lyndsay Christensen; Christopher Rhodes; Martin Myers; Gina Leinninger
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 7.422

8.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

9.  An analysis of licking microstructure in three strains of mice.

Authors:  A W Johnson; A Sherwood; D R Smith; M Wosiski-Kuhn; M Gallagher; P C Holland
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.